Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Amazon isn’t showing you the best prices unless you are a Prime member or placing a large order

No matter the intention, it doesn’t look good.

Jeff Bezos being interviewed by Walt Mossberg at the 2016 Code Conference
Jeff Bezos being interviewed by Walt Mossberg at the 2016 Code Conference
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos at the 2016 Code Conference
| Asa Mathat
Jason Del Rey
Jason Del Rey has been a business journalist for 15 years and has covered Amazon, Walmart, and the e-commerce industry for the last decade. He was a senior correspondent at Vox.

Amazon has been going to increasingly great lengths to convert shoppers into Prime members and merchants into sellers whose products are eligible for Prime’s speedy delivery service.

But a new report from the nonprofit investigative news organization ProPublica shows Amazon may have crossed a line.

The report, published on Tuesday morning, found problems with Amazon’s price-comparison pages, which are supposed to allow customers to find the lowest price on a given product. But the tool seems to rank products in a way that favors items sold by Amazon, or merchants who pay Amazon to ship products on their behalf.

When Amazon sorts products by price on a page like this, it includes the cost of shipping fees in its calculation for some products, but not for others.

Specifically, products sold by third-party merchants not participating in Amazon’s shipping service are ranked according to the product’s price plus the shipping fee.

But products sold by Amazon or from third-party merchants that participate in its shipping service are ranked without the shipping cost added, thus showing them as cheaper than they really are.

Part of the reason for that discrepancy may be that Amazon Prime members generally do not pay for shipping, and so for those customers, the price comparison rankings would be accurate. Some non-Prime members also make sure they spend $49 on an order, so that it hits the threshold for free shipping. The price-comparison lists would be accurate for those customers as well.

But for the average customers who do not pay Amazon $99 a year to participate in the Prime program — and don’t plan to spend $49 on an order — the prices they see on these lists do not reflect the final cost. In these cases, Amazon products may be shown as cheaper when the cost may be higher depending on the shipping fee.

We’ve reached out to Amazon for comment and we’ll update if we hear back.

Update: Amazon responded with the following comment:

With Prime and Super Saver Shipping (which requires no membership and ships orders above $49 for free), the vast majority of our items — 9 out of 10 — can ship for free. The sorting algorithms the article refers to are designed for that 90% of items, where shipping costs do not apply.

To be clear, while nine out of 10 items can ship for free, as Amazon states, it’s sometimes contingent on the order totaling $49 or more. Costumers don’t necessarily see the shipping cost for items when ordered below the $49 threshold and these items might rank differently when factoring in the shipping cost.

Update No. 2: Amazon is now saying the first statement wasn’t completely accurate so they’ve requested an update. The new statement looks a lot like the above excepted the word “items” has been changed to “items ordered” in both the first and second sentence. The new statement still doesn’t address the fact that if a non-Prime member looks at a price comparison page, they are seeing inaccurate rankings unless they plan on hitting the $49 free-shipping threshold.

With Prime and Super Saver Shipping (which requires no membership and ships orders above $49 for free), the vast majority of our items ordered – 9 out of 10 – can ship for free. The sorting algorithms the article refers to are designed for that 90% of items ordered, where shipping costs do not apply.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh