Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Police can’t read your iMessages, but here’s what they can see

Apple can tell them who you’ve tried to ping.

A model texting on her mobile is seen backstage at a fashion show in Berlin
A model texting on her mobile is seen backstage at a fashion show in Berlin
Clemens Bilan / Getty Images for P&C and Fashion ID

While Apple has made a big deal over the past few years about how little customer data it stores on its servers, that doesn’t mean the iPhone maker doesn’t have any information that police agencies can get their hands on.

As noted by The Intercept, one thing Apple knows is which phone numbers a person is at least considering sending a message to. That’s because as soon as an iPhone owner types in a phone number, Apple’s servers are pinged to determine whether the number represents another iOS device.

If so, Apple will send any messages using its own service (they appear in a blue bubble). If not, Apple will send any messages as a standard text message (displayed in green).

That Apple’s servers would be pinged with every number a person is messaging should not come as a surprise. After all, how else would the iPhone know how to send the message?

More of a revelation was the fact that Apple stores the information for 30 days. Choosing how to send messages is tricky and has caused Apple problems in the past, especially when a user switches from iPhone to Android.

About three and a half years ago, Apple engineers started storing a cache of which numbers customers were trying to message in order to help identify bugs and address customer complaints, according to a source familiar with the company’s efforts.

So what does all this mean? Apple still has far less information about its messages than a cellular provider has on its customers’ standard text messages. Carriers would likely be able to determine not only exactly what message was sent and when, but also where the customer was when they sent it.

Apple, for its part, doesn’t appear to even know if a message was sent to a particular number or details on any follow-up conversations — only that at one point a number was typed into an iOS device.

The iPhone maker has always said that it will share data it has access to with law enforcement agencies upon a lawful request, such as a warrant or other court order.

However, since Apple has crowed about how little data it stores on its customers, it’s definitely worth knowing what information it does keep.

“Because iMessage is encrypted end-to-end, we do not have access to the contents of those communications,” Apple said. “In some cases, we are able to provide data from server logs that are generated from customers accessing certain apps on their devices.”

All this is a reminder that just because a message is encrypted doesn’t mean that there are no digital breadcrumbs left behind.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh