Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Jay Z is selling a third of Tidal, which makes sense. Sprint is buying a third of Tidal, which makes less sense.

The music service is now worth a reported $600 million.

TIDAL X: 1020 Amplified by HTC - Show
TIDAL X: 1020 Amplified by HTC - Show
Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images for TIDAL
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Jay Z hasn’t found a new owner for Tidal, his streaming music service. But he’s getting closer.

Sprint says it has bought a third of Tidal; Billboard says the carrier is paying $200 million for its stake, which pegs Tidal’s value at $600 million.

Sprint and the music service aren’t offering any other details, except that Sprint customers will get “exclusive artist content not available anywhere else” and that Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure will join Tidal’s board.

Jay Z has been shopping Tidal for at least a year — Samsung, which seemed like a logical buyer, kicked its tires for a while, then walked away; everyone else gave it at least a look — so it’s logical to assume that this deal gives Sprint a “path to control”: The ability to buy a majority stake in the company over time.

It’s also logical to see why he’d want to get out of the streaming business, which he entered by buying Aspiro, a Swedish streaming company, for $56 million in 2015: Everyone in the streaming music business loses money.

That doesn’t matter to tech giants like Apple and Amazon, who use music to promote other products. It also doesn’t seem to matter to bigger streaming music companies like Pandora and Spotify, that have investors willing to bet that they’ll figure out how to turn a profit, one day.

But if you’re Jay Z and you’re running a small scale streaming business — Tidal claims it has three million subscribers, though those numbers have been disputed — then you’re either funding those losses out of your pocket or getting someone else to do it for you. So an early exit would have always been part of the plan.

It’s not surprising to see Sprint bet on streaming. Sprint’s owner SoftBank has long been interested in music, and at one point tried to buy Universal Music, the world’s largest music label.

It is harder to see what Sprint gets out of the deal.

Yes, it can use Tidal exclusives as a marketing sweetner. But this is the same issue that AT&T has if/when it buys Time Warner: All of the content that makes the entertainment company valuable only has value if everyone can get to it, regardless of which carrier/cable company they use.

That is, you can make, say, a single Jay Z track exclusive to Sprint customers. But if you lock up all of his music on a single carrier, then the overall Jay Z market is going to get much, much smaller than Jay Z likes.

Meanwhile, you certainly don’t need to buy a streaming music service to do a promotional deal with a streaming music service. All of the carriers have done variations on this, for years, without taking equity stakes.

Here’s a good hunch: In a year or so, Jay Z will have sold the whole thing to Sprint, which will be left trying to figure that problem out for itself.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady