Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Tesla is suing its ex-Autopilot director for allegedly poaching employees and stealing confidential information

Sterling Anderson was working with the former CTO of Google’s self-driving arm, Chris Urmson.

Tesla

Tesla filed a suit against its former director of Autopilot, Sterling Anderson, on Thursday, alleging he attempted to recruit engineers from Tesla to join the self-driving startup he and the former CTO of Google’s self-driving arm, Chris Urmson, were establishing.

The suit further alleged that Anderson downloaded “hundreds of gigabytes of Tesla confidential and four proprietary information” documents to his personal computer. When he was terminated, Anderson returned the documents, but not the backups he created, the company alleged.

In addition to making offers to a dozen Tesla employees — only two of whom accepted, according to the suit — Tesla is also alleging Anderson worked on the company Urmson was starting, called Aurora, during company time. Recode first reported that Urmson was starting his own self-driving company and that he was recruiting big names from many players, including Tesla and Uber.

The suit claims that Urmson recruited Tesla engineers on behalf of Anderson, and Anderson recruited engineers from Google on behalf of Urmson to avoid being accused of breach of contract.

According to the suit:

Although Anderson worked mostly behind the scenes so that he could try to create the false impression that his “hands stayed clean” — ignoring that his contract with Tesla prohibited both direct and indirect solicitation of Tesla employees — he took a more hands-on role with respect to certain recruits, directly lobbying them to join Aurora.

Anderson’s conversations with Urmson began in the summer of 2016, according to the suit, but it wasn’t until December 2016 that he notified Tesla he was leaving. The company claims that he did not indicate he was leaving to join a competing venture with Urmson and instead said that he was going to spend time with family or start a non-competing company.

“Obviously, had Anderson disclosed the true facts to Tesla, he would have been terminated immediately,” the suit read. “Instead, it was agreed that Anderson would remain with the company through the release of the next Autopilot upgrade, expected within the following several weeks.”

Anderson joined Tesla in 2014 as a senior product manager and was promoted to director of Autopilot in 2015.

Tesla also claims Anderson attempted to cover his tracks and wiped his work computer and iPhone before returning them to the company “in a manner intended to prevent them from being restored and manipulated the timestamps,” the suit reads.

The company is seeking damages, to be determined during a jury trial, from both Anderson and Urmson for breach of contract, breach of duty of loyalty and aiding and abetting breach of duty of loyalty among other things.

Update: Urmson sent Recode this statement: “Tesla’s meritless lawsuit reveals both a startling paranoia and an unhealthy fear of competition. This abuse of the legal system is a malicious attempt to stifle a competitor and destroy personal reputations. Aurora looks forward to disproving these false allegations in court and to building a successful self-driving business.”

Tesla said it had no comment beyond what was included in the suit.

Here’s the full suit:

Tesla v Anderson by Johana Mb on Scribd


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh