Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The most successful e-commerce brands build for mainstream America, not Silicon Valley

A venture-backed company not built for venture capitalists is on the verge of an IPO.

Photo of Stitch Fix boxes
Photo of Stitch Fix boxes
Stitch Fix Facebook page
Jason Del Rey
Jason Del Rey has been a business journalist for 15 years and has covered Amazon, Walmart, and the e-commerce industry for the last decade. He was a senior correspondent at Vox.

One knock on venture-backed, e-commerce startups over the years is that they are sometimes built around the tastes of venture capitalists and big-city entrepreneurs, and not the vast majority of average Americans who live outside of U.S. technology hubs.

Call it the Silicon Valley blind spot.

In recent years, that blind spot has become a problem for companies like Fab, One Kings Lane and Juicero, each of which raised north of $100 million in investments only to find that their core customer base was much smaller than they had hoped. Not to mention all the on-demand dry-cleaning, car-valet and meal-delivery startups that have flopped.

But the biggest e-commerce IPOs and company sales of the last few years prove that you can succeed by going for mass appeal. And, in fact, that you probably should if you are going to be raising tens of millions of dollars or more at big valuations.

Companies like Dollar Shave Club, Chewy, Zulily and Wayfair have had huge financial outcomes by going after what seems like an obvious customer base: Mainstream America.

Soon you can add Stitch Fix to that list. The online fashion retailer, which operates a personal styling service to hand-pick each customer’s order, has filed to go public on the Nasdaq stock exchange. It will likely command a valuation of $2 billion to $4 billion once it IPOs, on the back of torrid — and mostly profitable — revenue growth.

The San Francisco-based company uses a combination of stylists and data science to select five clothing and accessory items at a time for a customer to try on at home. Stitch Fix charges a $20 “styling fee” upfront, which might be a splurge for some people, but it is deducted from an order total should a customer choose to purchase any of the items in their box.

The clothing selection itself carries prices that are more middle class than 1 percent, though customers can request more or less expensive items as they desire. When the model is at its best, it acts as the personal stylist the average American never could have previously afforded.

Of course, building a business for a mass market customer base does not guarantee any success. Dollar Shave Club, for example, was exceptional at viral marketing; Chewy at customer service; and Stitch Fix at building a unique offering that garnered the kind of phenomenal word-of-mouth promotion that let it keep advertising expenses in check.

There are more in the pipeline: Wish has taken this idea to the next level by targeting value shoppers not only in the U.S. but across the globe. My educated guess is that the company could go public next year.

Other venture-backed companies like Ibotta, Hollar and Tophatter are not the sexiest, but have smartly focused on the mainstream America consumer.

If Stitch Fix’s IPO goes as planned, there will likely be many, many more that follow.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh