Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

SoftBank is insisting it could walk away from an Uber deal

“By no means is our investment decided,” says SoftBank.

An Uber sign in the windshield of a car
An Uber sign in the windshield of a car
Spencer Platt / Getty

In a likely attempt to increase its negotiating leverage ahead a $10 billion deal, SoftBank on Monday said it could easily jettison the Uber transaction that in principle was struck just one day earlier.

In a rare, pointed statement from the head of SoftBank’s Vision Fund, the Japanese investors sought to downplay its interest in pursuing a deal no matter what. SoftBank has spent enormous sums to buy shares in some of Silicon Valley’s priciest companies, but the new public comment seems to be a message to Uber’s investors: If you charge us too much, we’ll walk.

“After a long and arduous process of several months it looks like Uber and its shareholders have agreed to commence with a tender process and engage with SoftBank,” said SoftBank’s Rajeev Misra in a statement distributed to reporters. “By no means is our investment decided. We are interested in Uber but the final deal will depend on the tender price and a minimum percentage shareholding for SoftBank.”

Uber is on the cusp of launching a tender offer during which existing shareholders could sell their shares to a SoftBank-led constortium of investors. But if the price offered by SoftBank per share is too low — and not enough sellers are willing to sell — then the transaction would fail, Uber’s proposed governance reforms would fade away and the troubled company would be back to square one.

Later on Monday, in a second statement, SoftBank described the sides as having come to a “basic agreement” but not a “final agreement.”


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh