Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The city of Chicago is suing Uber for failing to disclose the 2016 breach of 57 million users’ data

The city said Uber did not correct security vulnerabilities in its system as it agreed to after a previous data hack.

Uber logo on a mobile phone in front of the Uber sign
Uber logo on a mobile phone in front of the Uber sign
studioEAST / Getty

The city of Chicago has filed a lawsuit against Uber for failing to disclose a 2016 data breach that affected 57 million of its users.

The lawsuit comes just days after the Illinois attorney general’s office told Recode that it was opening an investigation into the company.

In addition to failing to notify users and the public about the information that was exposed, the company paid the hackers $100,000 to delete the data and subsequently had them sign nondisclosure agreements. The city further alleges that the ride-hail company failed to correct security vulnerabilities that led to a previous data breach in 2014.

The complaint reads:

“After the details of Uber’s May 12, 2014 data breach were revealed to the public, Uber was investigated by a number of state and federal regulators that were concerned about its inadequate data security practices. Uber ultimately promised to bolster its data security policies by, inter alia, adopting protective technologies for the storage, access, and transfer of private information ... less than a year later the same failures led to a breach that was one thousand times worse.”

The city, which is also suing Uber on behalf of Illinois residents, is asking for a series of monetary damages in addition to a jury trial. The city has asked that a judge fine Uber $10,000 a day for each day that it violated the state’s ordinance on public information disclosure.

The city is also asking for the court to levy a $50,000 fine against the company for violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act.

In addition to Illinois, at least four other states — Massachusetts, Missouri, New York and Connecticut — told Recode that they would investigate the matter, after Uber revealed that the intrusion exposed names, addresses and driver’s license numbers in some cases.

Have more information or any tips? Johana Bhuiyan is the senior transportation editor at Recode and can be reached at johana@recode.net or on Signal, Confide, WeChat or Telegram at 516-233-8877. You can also find her on Twitter at @JmBooyah.

Additionally, the company is facing a series of questions from the U.S. Congress over why it took so long to disclose the hack. Some of those lawmakers asked for a full timeline of what the company discovered about the breach.

Others, like Democratic Sen. Mark Warner, who sent his own letter to Uber on Monday, asked Uber how it managed to find the hackers in the first place. Given Uber’s “past pattern of conduct,” Warner wondered if the company tried to “hack back” the hackers, which is illegal under federal law.

Update: An Uber spokesperson responded to our request for comment: “We take this matter very seriously and we are happy to answer any questions regulators may have. We are committed to changing the way we do business, putting integrity at the core of every decision we make, and working hard to re-gain the trust of consumers.”

Here’s the full complaint:

Chicago CCSAO Uber 11.27.17 Complaint by Johana Bhuiyan on Scribd


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh