Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Shervin Pishevar is officially leaving Sherpa Capital

“I plan to focus now on the appropriate ongoing legal actions against those who are unjustly orchestrating the smear campaign against me.”

TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2016 - Day 3
TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2016 - Day 3
Photo by Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch

Shervin Pishevar is officially resigning from his post at venture firm Sherpa Capital to focus on an ongoing lawsuit he has filed against people who he claim have disseminated false sexual harassment claims.

Pishevar, who co-founded Sherpa Capital along with Scott Stanford, announced he would take a temporary leave of absence both from Sherpa and Hyperloop One on Dec. 5 after initial accusations of sexual misconduct by multiple women surfaced. Two days later, another female entrepreneur came forward with claims of sexual harassment.

“Unfortunately, it is no surprise that the untruthful attacks by those seeking to harm me and my family, including those willing to go so far as fabricating police reports, have continued unabated even after I announced my leave of absence from Sherpa,” Pishevar wrote in a statement. “My truculent opponents are out to settle scores that have nothing to do with Sherpa, and I refuse to allow my enemies to drag my Sherpa family into their fight with me.”

Pishevar is also a prominent donor to the Democratic Party; several politicians have reportedly said they will direct the money he donated to them to charities.

Pishevar, who was an Uber board observer for many years, has filed a lawsuit against Definers Public Affairs, an opposition research firm, which has denied spreading information about him.

The firm represents companies, from insurance behemoths to tech giants, that seek to dig up dirt on their competitors.

While Pishevar said in his lawsuit that he did not know which potential competitor or enemy Definers represented, he claimed that “one or more of his business competitors” hired the firm in a bid to “assassinate” his character “and therefore destroy his career.”


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh