Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Clifford Levy is the glue behind the New York Times’ digital transformation

Levy is No. 76 on the Recode 100.

Monica Schipper / Getty

Clifford Levy is the glue behind the New York Times’ digital transformation

Levy is No. 76 on the Recode 100.

There’s a good chance you read the New York Times (kudos, by the way), which means you’re probably scrolling through its website, or thumbing through its app, or following its Twitter feed (along with some NYT reporters), or dropping a comment, or digesting a dozen newsletters, or buying a gift off a newly expanded Wirecutter, or baking a dish from NYT Cooking, or streaming a show recommended by NYT Watching, or generally cursing/praising its homepage redesign.

You can thank Clifford Levy for much of that.

Of course, a lot of people at the Times are responsible for this sweeping transformation. But the Times is also a place of deep habits that go back a century and a half. That meant the publisher — more than almost any another institution — required an honest broker, a journalist-merchant who could reliably represent both sides of the deal as it turned to digital publishing.

That’s Levy. As the paper’s deputy managing editor overseeing digital platforms, he’s become the unseen glue behind the newsroom’s digital initiatives. He’s tied the publisher’s customs to the edge of online publishing, employing his sharp eye for digital mechanics and reader habits. And while the Times now has plenty of smart, digital folks, including those from the fifth-generation Ochs-Sulzberger clan that controls the paper, Levy represents the storied newsroom’s ambitions in a way that only a three-decade veteran, two-time Pulitzer winner can.

“Right now it’s really a process of figuring out what I like to refer to as almost a radical evolution of the newsroom at the New York Times,” Levy told Recode last year. But it also comes down to the Times’ deep ethic for unmatched reporting, adding, “We want to figure out how to change as fast as that landscape is changing, while, as I said, doing it in a way that is rooted in our core values, and for us that means great journalism.” (See No. 3, Jodi Kantor, Megan Twohey; No. 23, Maggie Haberman; and No. 67, Michael Barbaro on this list.)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh