Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Marty Baron explains what it will take for the Washington Post to call a Trump lie a lie

Live from Code Media 2017.

Jason Del Rey
Jason Del Rey has been a business journalist for 15 years and has covered Amazon, Walmart, and the e-commerce industry for the last decade. He was a senior correspondent at Vox.

The New York Times has called out President Trump for telling lies. The Washington Post, like the Wall Street Journal, has opted for words like “false” or “falsehood” instead.

The Post’s top editor, Marty Baron, explained why in an interview with Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg on Tuesday at Recode’s Code Media conference at the Ritz-Carlton in Dana Point, Calif.

“I think we should call things false when we know they’re false ... and we have,” Baron said. But using the word lie “does suggest that you know [the person] knew it was false” and said it anyway.

“Absent evidence of that,” Baron said, don’t expect the Washington Post to use the L word in reporting about the current administration.

The paper will need proof that Trump knew what he said was false and said it anyway. And that hasn’t happened — “not yet” at least, Baron said.

Baron is perhaps best known as the one-time editor of the Boston Globe when it won a Pulitzer for its investigation into the Catholic Church’s sexual molestation scandal. This work was the basis for the Academy Award’s 2016 Best Picture nominee, “Spotlight,” in which Baron was played by Liev Schreiber.

He’s been the top editor at the Washington Post since late 2012. Seven months later, Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos purchased the paper for $250 million.

Watch his full interview below.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady