Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google’s top Europe exec has apologized for running ads next to offensive YouTube videos

European advertisers have been pulling ads from Google and YouTube.

Advertising Week Europe 2016 - Day 3
Advertising Week Europe 2016 - Day 3
Matt Brittin at Advertising Week Europe in 2016
Tristan Fewings/Getty Images for Advertising Week Europe

Google’s European head apologized Monday to anyone whose ads have appeared next to questionable content on YouTube. He said the company would look into simplifying tools for advertisers as part of a solution.

“We’re sorry to anybody that’s been affected,” Matt Brittin, head of Google’s operations in Europe, told an audience during an advertising conference in London.

Last week, a number of British advertisers pulled ads from Google and its giant video site over concerns ads could be appearing next to YouTube videos containing hate speech and extremist messages.

The ads in question were placed via software which allows advertisers to automatically buy ads within YouTube targeted to specific demographic groups.

The Guardian, which has removed ads, reported discovering some had appeared next to inappropriate content such as “videos of American white nationalists, a hate preacher banned in the U.K. and a controversial Islamist preacher.”

The British government and media buying firm Havas, which represents clients including O2, EDF and Royal Mail, have also pulled ads, and more advertisers announced this weekend they were suspending ads.

Havas said Google had been “unable to provide specific reassurances, policy and guarantees that their video or display content is classified either quickly enough or with the correct filters.”

“The decision of our U.K. team to pause activity with our partner Google is a temporary move made on behalf of our U.K. clients and their specific needs. The Havas Group will not be undertaking such measures on a global basis. We are working with Google to resolve the issues so that we can return to using this valuable platform in the U.K.,” Havas told Recode in a statement.

The recent controversy comes on the tail of an incident last month where Google removed a popular YouTube creator from its preferred advertising program over issues with hate speech in the creator’s videos. The Wall Street Journal found that Felix Kjellberg, known as PewDiePie, had posted several anti-Semitic videos.

Brittin said Google was in the process of reviewing ad policies and controls, and that this involved questions around how to properly define hate speech. He said the company may simplify tools provided to advertisers as part of its solution.

“I think that if the tools are there but they’re too complex, that’s our problem,” he said.

Currently, Google reviews content flagged as inappropriate either by users or technology including machine learning algorithms, he said.

Reporters at the conference asked whether Google planned to take a more proactive approach by having employees actively identify content not necessarily found through these filters. It remains unclear whether that change will be part of Google’s solution.

While Brittin said Google takes responsibility for recent brand safety issues reported by its advertisers, he also said the problem was an issue for the entire ads industry.

“It’s not just a Google/YouTube issue, though we’re in the spotlight,” he said.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh