Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google is letting its advertisers who bolted see which videos their ads could run on

Google has faced advertiser angst over ads appearing alongside inappropriate content.

Google Chief Business Officer Philipp Schindler
Google Chief Business Officer Philipp Schindler
Google Chief Business Officer Philipp Schindler
Asa Mathat

Google is giving advertisers more information about where their ads display on YouTube after marketers pulled business because ads were funding videos of hate speech and terrorism.

GroupM, the world’s largest media buying firm, said it has signed up a company to help ensure that its clients’ ads run against appropriate content. GroupM clients include L’oreal cosmetics, HSBC Bank, Lloyds Banking Group, supermarket chain Tesco and retailer Marks and Spencer. Those five advertisers publicly announced earlier this month they had suspended ads on YouTube in the U.K.

A source close to the situation said Google supplied GroupM with the complete list of YouTube channels in Google’s so-called Preferred advertising program. The list is not publicly available, but other Google clients may also request it. Clients advertising on these channels otherwise receive reports from Google about where ads have already run, but without the list cannot know for certain where their ads could potentially run.

Google Preferred includes higher-quality videos or YouTube channels with large followings.

GroupM is using video analytics company OpenSlate to analyze the content of channels on the list GroupM obtained. This will allow GroupM to determine ahead of time where ads from their clients should run. OpenSlate will earn a commission when GroupM’s clients use the monitoring service, according to GroupM.

The media buyer said Google already made similar third-party analysis possible in other areas, but that this was the first time it was possible with preferred content.

OpenSlate does not have a contract with Google or special access to the company’s data, Google confirmed.

Last month, Google removed a popular YouTube creator from its preferred advertising program over issues with hate speech in the creator’s videos. The Wall Street Journal found that Felix Kjellberg, known as PewDiePie, had posted several anti-Semitic videos. Disney subsidiary Maker Studios cut ties with Kjellberg following the discovery.

With 53 million subscribers, PewDiePie’s channel was one of the most popular on YouTube and was considered “brand safe” until the Journal pointed out the inappropriate content. The revelation highlighted the risk of social video content for brands seeking to advertise.

Update: This post has been updated to include more details about information Google gave GroupM and to clarify OpenSlate’s relationship with GroupM and Google.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh