Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Usernames no longer count toward Twitter’s 140-character limit

Twitter is finally giving users more room to reply to other people’s tweets.

Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit - Day 2
Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit - Day 2
Kimberly White/Getty Images for Vanity Fair

Twitter is making good on a product promise the company announced almost a year ago but never rolled out: Longer tweet replies.

Beginning Thursday, when you reply to another user’s tweet, that person’s username won’t count toward the 140-characters allotted for your response. That means you’ll have more room to share whatever it is you have to say.

The move is part of a broader effort at Twitter to go “beyond 140” characters and give people more room to tweet without dramatically altering the company’s signature 140-character limit. For a while in late 2015 and early 2016, the company considered expanding the character limit to 10,000 characters. But that plan fell through.

Twitter first announced this update last May but is just now rolling it out; Twitter said at the time it wanted to give partners who use its API a chance to prepare for longer tweets.

But that was 10 months ago, and Twitter pushed out other updates that gave users more room as early as September. So who knows.

The update is here now, though, so enjoy the extra room to tell people exactly how you really feel.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh