Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A government watchdog is investigating Trump’s attempt to unmask his Twitter critic

The demand made by the Department of Homeland Security — which was later rescinded — drew a lawsuit from Twitter.

Nation Focused On Tumultuous Presidential Campaigns As Election Day Approaches
Nation Focused On Tumultuous Presidential Campaigns As Election Day Approaches
Spencer Platt / Getty

A federal watchdog is investigating whether the Trump administration abused its legal powers when it sought to force Twitter to unmask an anonymous so-called “alt agency” account that has been tweeting criticism of the president.

In March, officials at the Department of Homeland Security tried to tap customs laws in an attempt to figure out the identify of @ALT_USCIS, which claimed to be comprised of disaffected employees at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. In response, Twitter sued the Trump administration, claiming it was trying to stifle free speech — and federal officials quietly withdrew their request.

Still, the Department of Homeland Security’s actions drew a sharp rebuke from Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who later asked the agency’s inspector general to review the matter.

In a letter sent back to the lawmaker today, the watchdog office confirmed it is probing whether the DHS had done anything “improper” in its attempt to unmask the anonymous account — as well as whether there’s “potential broader misuse of summons authority” at the DHS.

For now, the inspector general said it already has found that the @ALT_USCIS account has not shared classified information. It also confirmed in writing to Wyden that it would not try to determine the identify of that anonymous Twitter user.

“The summons raised serious concerns about improper political use of [the agency’s] summons power to quash free speech,” Wyden said.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh