Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google is updating its search to demote fake news

The changes include new options for reporting bad content.

DLD Conference 2010
DLD Conference 2010
Google Vice President of Search Ben Gomes
Andreas Rentz/Getty Images for Hubert Burda Media

Google is demoting misleading and offensive content in its search by updating algorithms and offering users new ways to report bad results.

The change follows increased attention to flaws in top search results, including the promotion of fake news — and deliberately misleading or false information formatted to look like news — during the 2016 presidential election.

Google said it has updated its algorithms to better prioritize “authoritative” content. Content may be deemed authoritative based on signals such as affiliation of a site with a university or verified news source, how often other sites link to the site in question and the quality of the sites that link.

“We’ve adjusted our signals to help surface more authoritative pages and demote low-quality content, so that issues similar to the Holocaust denial results that we saw back in December are less likely to appear,” writes Ben Gomes, Google’s executive in charge of search, in a blog post published today.

Additionally, users can now flag autocomplete features and highlighted results that are offensive, false or otherwise problematic. “We plan to use this feedback to help improve our algorithms,” writes Gomes.

Here’s what that flagging will look like for snippets:

Demonstration of flagging snippet on Google
Demonstration of flagging snippet on Google
Google

And here’s what it will look like for autocomplete:

Demonstration of flagging autocomplete results, Google
Demonstration of flagging autocomplete results, Google
Google

It’s been a rough year for Google’s oldest and still most core product, search. As Search Engine Land founding editor Danny Sullivan wrote recently, search results may not actually be any worse than they used to be, but people increasingly see them as problematic. And that perception is a problem for Google.

Autocomplete and highlighted result snippets are two search features that have gotten attention for not performing as expected.

Previously, if you typed “are Jews” into search, one autocomplete option that surfaced was “are Jews evil?” Google tweaked autocomplete suggestions last year, shortly after it became aware of the problem, so things like this wouldn’t happen. The new flagging option is aimed at preventing future controversies.

Google drew criticism again this year when its highlighted top result for the query “is Obama planning a coup” was a snippet from a site called “Secrets of the Fed,” which said that the former president is trying to overthrow the government. (He is not.)

On top of Google drawing attention to the result at the top of text search, the snippet was what Google’s Assistant software on its Home device and Pixel phones would read aloud when asked verbally.

These latest attempts from Google to curb fake news follow announcements earlier this year that it had banned 200 publishers from its AdSense network after implementing a policy against fake news, and was introducing a fact-checking tag to search results.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh