Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The FCC is asking whether the agency needs net neutrality on its rulebooks at all

Read the agency’s notice of proposed rulemaking, which kicks off the debate.

Members Of The House Are Briefed On North Korea By Top Trump Administration Officials
Members Of The House Are Briefed On North Korea By Top Trump Administration Officials
Eric Thayer / Getty

The Federal Communications Commission isn’t just looking to scrap the net neutrality rules implemented under President Barack Obama — it’s weighing whether the agency should mandate new open internet protections at all.

In a speech on Wednesday, the FCC’s Republican chairman, Ajit Pai, blasted the “heavy-handed regulations” that treat the likes of AT&T, Charter, Comcast and Verizon akin to old-fashioned phone companies. Those rules, finished in 2015, aim to ensure internet providers don’t block, slow down or otherwise interfere with web content.

A day later, however, Pai unveiled the official document that begins the process of replacing the Obama-era FCC’s work. Called a notice of proposed rulemaking, it explicitly seeks public comment on a number of issues — including whether the agency even needs any overarching rules that ban ISPs from blocking or throttling web traffic, or creating “fast lanes” that allow companies to pay for speedier delivery of their content.

The FCC’s notice says, for example, that they don’t believe internet providers should block their competitors or interfere with webpages they dislike. But Pai and his team have expressed a great openness in the document in backing off from regulation — or, potentially, even allowing the telecom industry to play a greater role in policing itself.

Speaking on condition of background with reporters on Thursday, senior FCC officials said they’re “seeking comment on whether to keep the rules, to modify the rules or to eliminate any of the rules.” It’s the beginning of the process, not the end, they said, and they stressed “there is not a preordained course of action in terms of how these issues are going to be resolved.”

Even the mere possibility that the FCC could abandon such bright-line net neutrality protections, however, threatens to trigger a public backlash — from Silicon Valley, which supports the existing rules, as well as from consumers, nearly four million of whom wrote the agency last time it tried to regulate on the issue. The FCC will open its doors for public comment beginning next month, following a vote scheduled for May 18.

In the meantime, senior FCC officials said Thursday that Pai intends to enforce the net neutrality rules currently on federal rulebooks. And they said they expect — whatever they decide — that their final rules will draw another legal challenge.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh