Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Time Inc. isn’t selling itself after all, so its stock is down and job cuts are coming

The publisher will sell off some of its titles, though.

Donald Trump Makes Campaign Swing Through Iowa
Donald Trump Makes Campaign Swing Through Iowa
A Time magazine fan shows off a January 2016 edition.
Aaron P. Bernstein / Getty
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Time Inc. says it’s going to be fine on its own. Wall Street disagrees.

The magazine publisher’s shares are down more than 18 percent this morning after it announced it is not going to sell itself, after talking to potential buyers for months.

The fact that Time, whose assets include People, Sports Illustrated and Fortune, didn’t do a deal with rival publisher Meredith Corp. or another suitor is surprising. It will be interesting to figure out the real reason why it didn’t happen.

The fact that Time Inc. shares are down in the wake of the announcement is not surprising: Time traded around $14 up until late last year, when news broke that a group of investors including Edgar Bronfman Jr. had offered $18 a share for the company.

Now, without a sale on the horizon, Time shares are back down below $15.

Meanwhile Time Inc.’s board says it likes a plan laid out by newish CEO Rich Battista, which sounds a lot like the plan some would-be Time Inc. buyers said they would pursue: Focus on exploiting some of the company’s best-known magazine brands in digital and video, and cut costs to account for the company’s declining print business.

That means Time will almost certainly be shrinking its workforce, which various regimes have been cutting for years, but still stood at more than 7,400 people at the end of last year.

“You’re going to see us be smart and aggressive on the cost side,” Battista said in an interview.

And the publisher will also look to sell off some of the 25 titles it operates in the U.S. “We think we want to focus and double down on the core ones,” Battista said, without identifying which ones those are.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady