Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook is trying yet again to cut clickbait headlines from your News Feed

But this update may not hurt publishers as much as before.

Facebook

Facebook is tweaking its News Feed algorithm to fight a familiar foe: Clickbait, or articles that Facebook says “withhold information intentionally” or “mislead people, forcing them to click to find out the answer.”

If this sounds familiar, it should. This is the third time Facebook has tweaked its algorithm since late 2014 with the sole purpose of fighting clickbait stories.

What’s different this time around? Facebook says it’s getting more specific about how to minimize the reach of a clickbait post without necessarily hurting a publisher’s other content.

In an update from August, Facebook started punishing publisher Pages that routinely used clickbait headlines. Now it says it can detect clickbait on an individual story level, meaning it will suppress a specific article from gaining traction in News Feed, but won’t necessarily punish the publisher’s other posts.

It’s also going to start categorizing clickbait headlines into two categories: Those that “withhold information” and those that “exaggerate information.” Neither offense is considered worse than the other, but headlines that fall into both categories will have an even tougher time gaining traction in News Feed.

Facebook’s official stance here is that clickbait headlines run counter to its efforts to create an “informed community,” which was a pillar of CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s big manifesto back in February.

But a simpler way to think of this is that Facebook is admitting that clickbait stories do more harm than good among users, even though some publishers obviously benefit from them. It’s the same reason Facebook is penalizing publishers that drive people to sites full of ads, or publishers that post false news.

Facebook is still reeling from the aftereffects of last fall’s presidential election, when false news reports ran rampant in News Feed thanks in part to coordinated efforts meant to hurt specific candidates. Cracking down on false news, but also extreme headlines that encourage partisan sharing without any substance to back them up, has been a major company focus ever since.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander