Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Families of the San Bernardino terrorist attack victims have filed a lawsuit against Facebook, Google and Twitter

They contend that the tech industry and its practices have been “instrumental to the rise of ISIS.”

Mass Shooting In San Bernardino Leaves At Least 14 Dead
Mass Shooting In San Bernardino Leaves At Least 14 Dead
The FBI collects evidence following the San Bernardino shooting in December 2015.
Photo by Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images

Family members of three victims in the deadly 2015 terrorist attack on a San Bernardino, Calif., health facility filed a lawsuit this week against Twitter, Facebook and Google, alleging that they “knowingly and recklessly provided the terrorist group ISIS with accounts” and aid in the spread extremism.

In their complaint, the families told a federal court that the three social platforms — in failing to monitor profiles and take action against extremist accounts — had helped ISIS “raise funds, recruit and conduct terrorist operations,” including the attack that killed 14 about a year and a half ago.

“This material support has been instrumental to the rise of ISIS and has enabled it to carry out or cause to be carried out, numerous terrorist attacks, including the December 2, 2015, attack in San Bernadino,” they allege.

Concerning Twitter, for example, the families point out the flood of ISIS-related accounts on the platform in recent years. About Facebook, they contend that the San Bernardino shooters, including Tashfeen Malik, had declared their allegiance to ISIS in a previous Facebook post. As for Google, they allege that it essentially helps fund ISIS through advertisements that run before YouTube videos.

Spokespeople for all three companies did not immediately comment for this story.

The attack in December 2015 ignited fierce debate about the role of the tech industry in protecting national security. In the months after the attack, then-President Barack Obama and others in Washington pushed Silicon Valley to play a greater role in policing its platforms for potential threats. While companies have made progress, combatting radical organizations remains a major challenge. Google, in particular, has faced blowback from brands whose ads have appeared alongside extremist content.

Others in government would like to see tech companies make it easier for law enforcement to access their services and devices. That stance led to another court spat between the FBI and Apple, as investigators sought to force the company to crack a password-protected iPhone tied to the attack. Ultimately, the FBI gained entry into the device on its own.

Families of victims of other attacks similarly have taken aim at the tech industry. The relatives of a woman who was killed during the 2015 attack in Paris sued Facebook, Google and Twitter last year, specifically citing the fact they profited from ads on extremist videos. A number of families sued the same companies in March following the deadly June 2016 attack on the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Fla.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh