Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Eric Schmidt said ATMs led to more jobs for bank tellers. It’s not that simple.

The Alphabet executive chairman was citing a popular, and flawed, anecdote about automation.

Inflation Rises In The UK Following Brexit Vote
Inflation Rises In The UK Following Brexit Vote
Jack Taylor/Getty Images

Eric Schmidt is calling himself a “job elimination denier” when it comes to automation, and on Friday he shared a popular anecdote about ATMs to support his position. The problem is, the anecdote is not completely accurate.

ATMs led to an increase in the number of bank tellers, said Schmidt, the executive chairman of Google parent company Alphabet.

“There are more bank tellers now than ever because banks are more efficient,” he said at the Global Digital Futures Policy Forum at the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs.

He’s not entirely wrong. From 1970 to 2010, the number of bank tellers in the U.S. increased from a little under 300,000 to around 600,000, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers cited by the public policy think tank American Enterprise Institute.

But he’s not really right, either.

The reason ATMs led to more bank teller jobs is that ATMs allowed banks to open more branches, since each branch could be run with fewer tellers, which also meant banks could hire more tellers overall.

But now the number of branches is on the decline, “because of industry consolidation and technological change,” according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The federal agency predicts the number of bank teller jobs will decline to 480,500 by 2024, down from 520,500 in 2014.

That technological change includes some banks allowing customers to interact with tellers through webcams at ATMs, according to BLS. ATMs are generally getting more sophisticated, the Wall Street Journal pointed out in 2014.

Of course, teller job trends don’t all come down to ATMs. There are regulations and economic trends. And there’s mobile banking, which also involves automation of work previously handled by humans.

So can Schmidt say ATMs led to more bank teller jobs? For a time there was a correlation, but that’s not the same as saying bank tellers’ job prospects have benefited from automation.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh