Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Uber has been ordered to produce a key document in Alphabet’s lawsuit against the company

But it’s still not clear whether Alphabet will get the full due diligence report.

Uber is being ordered to produce a document that may help shed light on whether the company knew it possessed stolen Alphabet technology.

Uber came under scrutiny after it acquired self-driving trucking startup Otto, a business founded by Anthony Levandowski, who previously led Alphabet’s autonomous vehicle efforts. Alphabet claims Levandowski stole 14,000 proprietary files before leaving to start Otto and is suing Uber over allegations the ride-hailing startup misappropriated that technology.

As part of Uber’s acquisition of Otto, it commissioned a due diligence report, which could reveal if Uber was aware of any Alphabet technology Levandowski may have had in his possession. Alphabet has been pushing for months for Uber to release the report, but Uber has objected to a court order to do so.

This latest order is a small win for Alphabet in its pursuit of the report, though Uber could still object to the latest court order.

The document in question is a letter of agreement pertaining to Levandowski between Uber attorney John Gardner and Stroz Friedberg, the legal services firm that conducted the due diligence report.

A due diligence report is conducted by a third party as part of an acquisition. It looks at finances, legal issues and other details of the company that is being acquired.

Alphabet believes that through conducting the due diligence report of Otto, Uber would have been made aware of the documents Levandowski allegedly stole, which would mean Uber knew it was acquiring a company that possessed stolen technology.

Update: The letter could also prove that Uber took steps to prevent any such information made its way to the company, accoridng to a source close to the matter. The source said the Stroz letter focuses on the protocol by which Levandowski may have shared information with the firm, but does not discuss any actual information that was shared.

Recode has reached out to Alphabet and Uber for comment.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh