Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Drones may soon have to identify themselves electronically while in flight

The FAA wants to create a remote drone identification system.

24-Storey Grenfell Tower Block On Fire In West London
24-Storey Grenfell Tower Block On Fire In West London

It can be really hard to tell who is flying a drone, even if the aircraft is flying within a pilot’s line of sight. Just because you can see the drone doesn’t mean you can see the pilot, and when a drone is hundreds of feet in the air, the pilot could be anywhere.

The difficulty of identifying who is flying a drone has sparked alarm among law enforcement, which is one reason why the Federal Aviation Administration has opened a new rulemaking committee to try to find a solution that would allow police to identify drones remotely.

The FAA held its first meeting of that committee last week, and today the agency finally reported on what took place. At the meeting, participants — who included representatives from Amazon, Ford and the New York Police Department — talked about various remote identification solutions currently available, air traffic control for drones and concerns from law enforcement.

Though most drones that weigh over half a pound are registered, and thus should have an identification number on the drone, that ID is nearly impossible to see from the ground.

Not all drones over a half pound are registered, though, since a federal court nixed the FAA’s registration rules for non-commercial aircraft last month, saying the agency didn’t have the authority to require registration of drones that are being flown for fun.

Still, legislation is moving through Congress now that could restore the FAA’s authority to regulate non-commercial drones, which would allow the agency to reinstate the registration requirement.

Registration will likely be necessary for any remote identification system to work, since the drone would have to be listed in some sort of database in order to associate the aircraft with its operator or owner.

Off-the-shelf consumer drones have been used to smuggle drugs and cellphones into prisons by flying over fences. Aircraft could easily be modified to carry an explosive, and there’s even software available that allows drone operators to circumvent geographical restrictions on drones that prevent aircraft from flying near airports or over protected areas, like sports stadiums or military bases.

All good reasons for law enforcement to be concerned about the FAA moving forward with creating rules that would loosen restrictions on drones flying in U.S. skies.

The agency originally hoped it would release proposed rules about flying over people in December of last year, but multiple sources have told Recode that concerns from law enforcement on remote identification is one of the reasons that rulemaking has been delayed.

In March, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, an industry group, put out a call for proposals for a remote identification system for drones and received 45 unique responses, according to an FAA spokesperson.

DJI, the world’s largest consumer drone maker, submitted a proposal that would require drones to transmit their location and registration number via radio equipment already aboard most drones.

The committee is set to meet again July 18 and is supposed to present its recommendations for a remote drone identification system to the FAA by Sept. 30 of this year.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh