Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook found a new way to identify spam and false news articles in your News Feed

People who post 50-plus times per day are likely sharing spam or false news, Facebook says.

Facebook

Facebook has a new way of identifying false news and spam in users’ feeds, and it’s changing its News Feed algorithm again to try and remove that content from view.

Facebook claims that users who post a lot — meaning 50-plus times per day — are very often sharing posts that the company considers to be spam or false news. So now Facebook is going to identify the links that these super-posters share, and cut down on their distribution on the network.

That means the links shared by users who incessantly post won’t get the kind of reach they used to, even if they’re shared by a reputable Page. These users sound like they could be bots, but Adam Mosseri, Facebook’s VP in charge of News Feed, says the company is confident they are real people.

Facebook isn’t actually looking at the content from these links, Mosseri added. The correlation between these types of users and spammy/false content is strong enough that Facebook doesn’t have to.

“Those links [are] way disproportionately problematic. They’re very often either click-bait or sensationalism or false news,” Mosseri said. “It’s one of the strongest signals we’ve ever found for identifying a broad range of problematic content.”

This update is one of many changes Facebook has made in the past six months to try and cut down on false news content in News Feed. Fighting so called “fake news” has been a major priority for Facebook since the election, and many believe false news on Facebook helped play a part in the outcome. (Facebook has even hinted this might be the case.)

Because Facebook plays around with its algorithm all the time it is sometimes easy to overlook the changes, but they can have a significant impact. Facebook is where millions of Americans, and other around the world, get their news, and many publishers rely on Facebook for distribution.

This change shouldn’t really impact publishers, though, Mosseri says. Facebook is only looking at links shared by individuals who post 50-plus times per day, not Pages that post that often. A Page should only see a dip in traffic if it shares stories that these super-posters are also sharing.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady