Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Meet Daniel Richman, the Columbia professor who helped Comey leak his memos

Comey brought him up during the hearing.

One of the strangest moments in the James Comey hearing came when he cryptically confirmed asking a close friend to leak a memo about his dealings with Trump to the press. Comey didn’t name him, but he was referring to Daniel C. Richman, a professor at Columbia University’s Law School best known as an adviser to Comey.

Daniel Richman
Daniel Richman
Columbia University

Richman was not just randomly mentioned during the hearing. Comey brought him up in an important moment. Below is the exchange between Comey and Sen. Susan Collins where Richman is referred to.

Comey: I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. Didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons. I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel. I asked a close friend to do it.

Sen. Susan Collins: Was that Mr. Wittes?

Comey: No.

Sen. Susan Collins: Who was it?

Comey: A close friend who is a professor at Columbia Law School.

Speculation immediately grew that Richman was the source. He did not respond to Vox’s request for comment about his role, but Richman’s friends, and Richman himself, confirmed that it was true.

So now we know he was one of Comey’s close “associates,” as the New York Times story about the existence of Comey’s memos labeled some of the sources.

Richman has shown up in the Times’s reporting on Comey before. In an April 22, 2017 piece on how Comey tried to keep politics out of the FBI’s work, Richman defended his friend. “Jim sees his role as apolitical and independent,” he told the Times.

In a November 1, 2016 story about Comey’s much-derided decision to inform Congress — and the public — about a new inquiry into Hillary Clinton’s emails, Richman again sided with Comey.

“Those arguing that the director should have remained silent until the new emails could be reviewed — even if that process lasted, or was delayed, until after the election — give too little thought to the governing that needs to happen after November,” he stated.

So perhaps it should not come as much of a surprise that Richman helped Comey to make his now-famous memos public. But if Richman wasn’t in the public consciousness before for being a Comey confidante, he surely is now.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters