Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

It took nine years, but Bitly turned short web links into a real company

Spectrum Equity bought the no-longer-a-startup for $63 million.

Bitly CEO Mark Josephson
Bitly CEO Mark Josephson
Bitly CEO Mark Josephson
Bitly
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Techland, like most places, likes stories with extreme outcomes: Startup X sells for a gazillion dollars; Startup Y, once valued at a gazillion dollars, goes to zero.

So here’s a story that won’t get much attention: A modest success for a company that once had much grander aspirations.

That would be Bitly, a company that lets marketers and other businesses keep tabs on customers as they move around the web by generating short, trackable URL links.

Spectrum Equity just bought a majority stake in the nine-year-old company for $63 million. A press release doesn’t spell out the specifics but I’m told Spectrum now owns a significant majority of Bitly, and that the new deal values the company below the $100 million valuation of its last raise, back in 2012.

In other words, maybe the investors who put a reported $29 million into Bitly prior to the Spectrum deal got their money back. But they certainly didn’t make much on this.

Salt on the wound: There was a time, back in the early days of Twitter, that Bitly and its investors thought they had something really, really big on their hands.

Twitter was just ramping up, and Twitter used Bitly to shorten all the links its users generated, and that meant Bitly knew a ton about the way the internet worked — who clicked on what, when, where. Billions of times a month. Certainly that would be a huge data play, someday.

Then Twitter decided it would roll out its own link shortener, and Bitly’s ability to make money from the data it was generating never materialized. Most of Bitly’s attention was focused on its free product, and the money it made selling a premium version to publishers and marketers didn’t cover its costs.

If things continued on that trajectory, Spectrum wouldn’t be buying Bitly today — it would likely have quietly gone to zero. Instead, the private equity investor is buying a company with real revenue, and profits.

Credit a pivot, which started when CEO Mark Josephson joined the company in 2013.

“When I joined in we had two salespeople, three account managers and no marketing team,” he says today. “And the free product was better than the paid product. And we were burning cash.”

Josephson’s plan was to invert the company. He wanted to focus almost exclusively on Bitly’s paid product, pitched to enterprise customers.

Commence the long slog: Over four years, Josephson has swapped out all but three of the 45 employees who were at Bitly when he joined, and added another 30.

Now, he says, Bitly has more than 1,000 customers, paying an average of $1,000 a month: That’s more than $12 million in annual revenue, and Josephson says the company is able to make a profit on that.

Some of Spectrum’s money will go to buying out earlier investors. The remainder will help Bitly expand its sales team and give it capital for acquisitions, says Josephson, who is staying on.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady