Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

DraftKings CEO Jason Robins explains why his merger with FanDuel fell apart

Battling the FTC is expensive and time-consuming.

Houston Texans v Buffalo Bills
Houston Texans v Buffalo Bills
Brett Carlsen / Getty

DraftKings and FanDuel abandoned their plans for a merger on Thursday almost eight months after first announcing the plan back in November.

The catalyst for ending the arrangement was that the Federal Trade Commission was planning to challenge the proposed merger in court because of monopolistic reasons. (The two are the biggest daily fantasy sports sites around.)

Now, both companies plan to operate independently, just like they were 12 months ago.

DraftKings CEO Jason Robins is putting a positive spin on the decision to abandon the merger. Robins, who spoke to Recode about an hour after the news was announced, said that there were a number of factors why DraftKings and FanDuel decided to throw in the towel.

A big part of it was time and money — fighting the FTC would have been an expensive and lengthy process, and both companies have already spent millions fighting legal battles in order to operate in states that consider their product a form of gambling.

Robins says that’s not the entire reason the two sides will part ways, though. He also claims DraftKings is in a more stable position business-wise than it was a year ago when these conversations first started, which is the kind of reassurance you would expect Robins to offer. (Unsurprisingly, FanDuel sources are saying the same thing about their business.)

“When you combine that with the notion of spending a bunch of money and time in continuing to try and fight this, and probably not a whole high likelihood of success anyways, it made sense for us to move on,” Robins said.

In a statement, FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles voiced something similar: “There is still enormous, untapped market opportunity for FanDuel,” he wrote.

Robins says DraftKings isn’t in need of more cash. The company has raised more than $700 million.

“If there’s an opportunity to get the right partner involved and the deal made sense we would certainly consider raising more money but we don’t need to,” he added.

What will be interesting to watch is whether or not competition once again heats up between DraftKings and FanDuel now that the deal is dead. The two companies used to be bitter rivals. Then they agreed to merge and things became cordial. Will they go back to hating each other like they did in 2015, when they were each burning cash on extensive TV marketing campaigns?

“I don’t think we’ll ever really go back to that mindset,” Robins said, referring to the early days when the companies fought tooth and nail over users, team deals and venture capital. “We’re substantially larger now. There was this point in time where we were trying to chase down FanDuel and they were furiously fighting us off and that’s not the case anymore.”


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh