Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Vimeo finally explains why it’s not launching its own version of Netflix

(Spoiler: It would be very expensive.)

Tech And Media Elites Attend Allen And Company Annual Meetings In Idaho
Tech And Media Elites Attend Allen And Company Annual Meetings In Idaho
IAC chair Barry Diller and his wife, designer Diane von Furstenberg
Drew Angerer / Getty
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Vimeo spent years insisting that it was going to launch a subscription video service just like Netflix, YouTube and many others. Then, in June, IAC’s video unit abruptly announced that it wasn’t going to do that, after all.

What happened? IAC never formally explained, but it was relatively easy to guess: IAC’s Barry Diller and his lieutenants decided that it would be really expensive to compete with Netflix, YouTube and many others.

Today, IAC offered a formal explanation, which you can read below. Tl;dr: They decided it would be really expensive.

Here’s the relevant portion from IAC CEO Joey Levin’s shareholder letter, attached to the company’s earnings report:

“We have some competitive advantages at Vimeo, but as we got deeper into the execution and saw what [launching a subscription service] would require, and the compromises we would need to make in our mission to empower creators, the strategy started to look more and more like our competitors, and less and less like Vimeo.”

So that makes some sense. Although it doesn’t explain why Vimeo thought otherwise for years. During the company’s last earnings call — just three months ago — Levin was talking up plans for the service.

Now Levin is talking up Vimeo’s existing business, which turns out to be just fine: It has 828,000 people paying an average of $100 a year to use the free service’s pro-sumer tools. So they’ll keep working on that.

Meanwhile, if you’re into reading entertaining/passive-aggressive shareholder letters, you should read all of the one Levin published today, where he complains that investors aren’t properly valuing the conglomerate he runs.

His argument: IAC has lots of interesting businesses — like Vimeo — but investors only seem to care about its stakes in Match/Tinder and Angie’s List.

Money quote: “It’s an absurd outcome given that these businesses are clearly neither worthless nor even a cash drain — they are in aggregate profitable and growing, but such is the message from the market right now.”


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh