Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The solar eclipse was bigger for Facebook than any of the last four Super Bowls

Facebook says 66 million people “interacted” with the social network for the eclipse.

A crowd in Idaho watches the sky darken as the solar eclipse approaches totality.
A crowd in Idaho watches the sky darken as the solar eclipse approaches totality.
Natalie Behring / Getty

The NFL has been dethroned ... by Mother Nature.

Monday’s solar eclipse was bigger on Facebook than any Super Bowl we could find data for.

Facebook says that 66 million people worldwide created 240 million interactions about the eclipse, which includes “Likes,” posts, comments and reactions to other peoples’ posts.

The last four Super Bowl audiences on Facebook:

2017 — 64 million

2016 — 60 million

2015 — 65 million

2014 — 50 million

Take that, Tom Brady.

The numbers don’t mean much on the surface, but let’s overanalyze real fast.

  • Monday’s obsession with the eclipse shows that Facebook doesn’t need a massive TV event to draw Super Bowl-sized crowds. The social network has long pitched advertisers that it can deliver a “Super Bowl-sized” audience every day, but now we know it can deliver a Super Bowl-sized audience for events that have nothing to do with sports or football or traditional TV.
  • This massive crowd also explains why every publisher on the internet, including the fine folks over at Recode, were writing about the eclipse yesterday. Publishers gravitate toward topics people are talking about, and people were talking about a shadow.
  • As my colleague Peter Kafka pointed out to me, though, there is also a “chicken or the egg” scenario at play here. Were publishers writing about the eclipse because people were talking about it? Or were people talking about it because publishers were obsessively covering it? I’m going to go out on a limb and say yes!

The eclipse was a much smaller affair over on Twitter. The company says that there were more than six million tweets sent about the eclipse in a 24-hour window that ended Monday afternoon. The Super Bowl earlier this year resulted in more than 27 million tweets.

If you’re sad the eclipse is over, here is a collection of eclipse photos published by the New York Times to cheer you up.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh