Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Most tech investors think the industry’s companies are about to grow even more valuable

Less than half of investors said the same thing at the end of 2016.

Tech investors have grown increasingly bullish about the companies they fund over the last six months, even after a series of much-anticipated IPOs proved to pack more fizzle than pop in 2017.

Sixty-eight percent of investors told SharesPost, an industry research firm, that valuations for private companies will increase over the next 12 months. Only 49 percent said the same six months ago.

That’s despite the stock market’s unhappiness with new publicly traded tech companies like Snap and Blue Apron, whose shares have fallen below their initial IPO prices.

Gallons of available cash in venture capital have sent valuations for privately held companies skyrocketing lately, which may partly explain the uptick. Investors, of course, are inclined to predict high valuations for the companies they invest in (and that bring home cash for their firms), but that doesn’t wholly explain the change in sentiment here versus six months ago.

SoftBank’s latest Vision Fund, for instance, is playing with $100 billion — a reminder of the big appetite these days for tech investments.

The other figure that stands out from this survey: Investors are growing increasingly comfortable with secondary transactions, in which buyers can purchase existing shares from existing shareholders — even though the companies are private. Some in Silicon Valley view these trades as unreliable or perhaps even unsavory.

But now only 11 percent of investors describe these secondary shares as an unattractive asset class; twice as many respondents (23 percent) gave them a thumbs-down at the end of 2016.

We should note the sample size here is somewhat small — only 350 respondents for what SharesPost said is a margin of error of below six percentage points.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh