Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Emmys’ cheeky 9 to 5 reunion was also the show’s most strident anti-Trump moment

Dolly Parton, Lily Tomlin, and Jane Fonda got anti-Trump and pro-vibrators at the 2017 Emmy Awards.

Aja Romano
Aja Romano wrote about pop culture, media, and ethics. Before joining Vox in 2016, they were a staff reporter at the Daily Dot. A 2019 fellow of the National Critics Institute, they’re considered an authority on fandom, the internet, and the culture wars.

Sunday’s Emmys Awards brought a staunchly anti-Trump edition of the annual ceremony — and perhaps no moment was more political than the feisty reunion of Lily Tomlin, Dolly Parton, and Jane Fonda. The three stars of the hit ’80s film 9 to 5 minced few words in terms of implying that President Trump is a sexist bigot.

After the Hollywood legends were greeted with an instant standing ovation from the audience at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles, the perpetually luminous Parton kicked things off by commenting that she’d been wanting a reunion of the famously feminist farce ever since its 1980 release. And Fonda, the most notoriously outspoken of the trio, ran with the movie’s theme of standing up to sexism, noting, “Back in 1980, in that movie, we refused to be controlled by a sexist, egotistical, lying, hypocritical bigot.”

Tomlin then followed up Fonda’s quip with, “And in 2017, we still refuse to be controlled by a sexist, egotistical, lying, hypocritical bigot.”

The women were onstage to present the award for Best Supporting Actor in a Limited Series or Movie, but each was up for an Emmy herself. Parton was nominated in the TV movie category for her autobiographical Dolly Parton’s Christmas of Many Colors: Circle of Love (though she ultimately lost to Black Mirror’s “San Junipero.”) And Tomlin and Fonda were both nominated for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy Series for their Netflix comedy Grace and Frankie (they lost to Julia Louis-Dreyfus’s record-breaking Veep sweep). Though none of the three took home an Emmy on Sunday, they stole the spotlight from many of the evening’s other contenders.

The attention getter, predictably, was Parton, who trended briefly worldwide on Twitter following the presentation. “If it hadn’t been for good support,” she said, comparing the Supporting Actor category to her famously voluptuous cleavage, “Shock and Awe here would be more like Flopsy and Droopy.” About Grace and Frankie, she joked, “I’m just hoping that I am going to get one of those Grace and Frankie vibrators in my swag bag today” — referring to the show’s viral season two sex toy gag.

Clearly, these women haven’t lost their knack for comedy, either within or outside of regular business hours.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North