Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Sheryl Sandberg called Facebook’s ad-targeting embarrassment ‘totally inappropriate and a fail on our part’

The company is reinstating 5,000 targeting options that it temporarily banned last week.

The ad-targeting feature that allowed Facebook advertisers to target “Jew haters” and other offensive labels was “totally inappropriate and a fail on our part,” according to Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg.

Sandberg posted on Wednesday to express disappointment with the company’s embarrassing targeting options and explain Facebook’s plan to rectify the situation.

The issue was that advertisers were able to target users with words and phrases they manually entered under categories like field of study, school or job title. So when users put “Jew hater” as their job title, that automatically appeared as a legitimate targeting category to advertisers.

Facebook shut down the targeting option last week and said Wednesday that it is will reopen that targeting capability but in a more limited form. Facebook is reinstating 5,000 targeting options that had been temporarily banned — terms like “nurse” or “teacher.” Sandberg said these terms were the most commonly used, and have all been manually approved by a human.

In the future, Facebook won’t add new targeting options to this list without manual approval, a spokesperson confirmed.

Facebook also said it’s working on a program to let people “report potential abuses of our ads system” to the company, though it didn’t offer details.

As we mentioned last week, Facebook’s reliance on software to do things like sell and deliver ads — and determine what people see in News Feed — keeps getting the company into trouble. With two billion users, automating these processes is a necessity. But Facebook keeps getting burned by a lack of human oversight.

Here’s Sandberg’s full post.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady