Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Ravens-Jaguars London game just got much more interesting. Here’s how to stream it for free.

Two questions: Will Verizon get its $21 million worth? And how many players will defy Donald Trump?

Telvin Smith of the Jacksonville Jaguars protesting during the National Anthem before a 2016 game
Telvin Smith of the Jacksonville Jaguars protesting during the National Anthem before a 2016 game
Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

The Baltimore Ravens kick off against the Jacksonville Jaguars in London on Sunday at 9:30 am ET.

Normally a Ravens-Jaguars game wouldn’t be worth writing about, but the NFL and Verizon are hoping things will be different this time: Verizon is paying the NFL $21 million to stream the game worldwide.

That means it will be very, very easy to watch the game, for free, as long as you have a decent internet connection. Viewers around the world can watch via the NFL’s own site, as well as many properties Verizon now owns, including: Yahoo Sports, Go90, Yahoo, AOL, HuffPost, Tumblr, NFL Mobile, Complex and RatedRed.

If you are a regular human being, you may be very interested to see how the Ravens and Jaguars players respond to Donald Trump, who has essentially dared NFL players to protest at games this week.

And in case you’re wondering: Yes, they play the “Star Spangled Banner” before the NFL’s London games:

Here’s what Jaguars linebacker Telvin Smith and some of his teammates did during a Jacksonville/Baltimore game last year:

Telvin Smith of the Jacksonville Jaguars protesting during the National Anthem prior to a 2016 game
Maddie Meyer/Getty Images

And if you are the kind of human being who pays attention to the business of sports and media, you will be interested to see how aggressively Verizon promotes the game.

Will it autoplay the game across its properties, like Yahoo did when it streamed a London game two years ago and showed it to anyone who came anywhere near a Yahoo site or service whether they wanted to see it or not?

You’ll also want to see what Verizon’s final numbers look like on Monday. Two years ago, Yahoo ended up drawing the equivalent of 2.3 million viewers for its London game, which is a fraction of what the NFL gets for a game that gets broadcast across the U.S.

On the one hand, that’s not awful considering it’s a low-wattage game that will air when a good half of the U.S. is asleep. On the other hand, it was broadcast around the world, so ...

It’s also worth considering that the Thursday night games that Twitter streamed around the world last year drew an audience of less than 250,000 viewers per game. Twitter said publicly that the games reached the viewers it expected to reach; privately I’ve heard that they were underwhelmed.

Full context: The NFL — as well as other sports leagues around the world — are expecting big internet/tech/infrastructure companies like Verizon and Facebook to pay big money for the rights to their games over the next few years.

But at some point those companies may want to see evidence that there’s a big audience that wants to watch this stuff over the internet.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh