Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Russia-purchased ads on Facebook during the 2016 election were aimed at stoking social tensions

The Kremlin-sourced ads played on both sides of issues like Black Lives Matter.

Some of the suspicious Facebook ads purchased by Russian agents ahead of the 2016 presidential election were aimed at influencing its outcome by preying on racial, religious and other social tensions in the United States, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

At times, these Kremlin-sourced ads even played on both sides of an issue — advancing and opposing causes including Black Lives Matter and gun control, for example — in a bid to stir potential political unrest, said the sources, confirming a report by the Washington Post on Monday.

Tony Romm is the senior editor for policy and politics at Recode. He can be reached at tony@recode.net, or on Signal, Confide, iMessage and WhatsApp at 215.779.9597.

The suspect ads comprise a small slice of the roughly 3,000 ads that have become the subject of increasing scrutiny by the U.S. Congress as well as former FBI Director Robert Mueller, who is leading the U.S. government’s official probe into Russian interference during the 2016 election.

Facebook hinted at some of the ads’ content in a blog post earlier this month, saying, “the ads and accounts appeared to focus on amplifying divisive social and political messages across the ideological spectrum — touching on topics from LGBT matters to race issues to immigration to gun rights.”

The new — if meager — details about Russia’s approach to playing both sides of divisive issues are guaranteed to keep Facebook in the political hot seat, all at a time when the company is facing criticism for allowing political advertisers and others to target users based on sensitive demographic information, such as race or religion.

A spokesman for Facebook declined comment. Spokespeople for the House and Senate committees investigating the matter did not immediately respond to requests seeking comment.

Speaking on CBS’s “Face the Nation” over the weekend, Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, acknowledged the ads’ tone: He said they were “designed not only to help Donald Trump or hurt Hillary Clinton, but more fundamentally, to divide Americans, to pit one American against another on some very divisive issues.”

So far, Facebook has provided the full tranche of Russia-tied ads only to Mueller. It has not yet shared all 3,000 with investigators on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, according to two sources, though it promised to do so last week. The company also announced a number of major changes to its advertising platform, including new transparency requirements.

Nor is it the only tech company facing scrutiny in the nation’s capital. This week, lawmakers investigating Russia’s alleged election meddling plan to grill another tech giant — Twitter — over the spread of misinformation on its own platform. The company will brief the House Intelligence Committee, a source confirmed, in addition to its Senate counterpart, a meeting first reported last week.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh