Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Trump campaign showing donor names on its State of the Union stream is tone-deaf but inconsequential

It’s aimed at squeezing more money out of loyal small donors, not the superrich.

Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

President Trump’s reelection campaign has announced that, during its broadcast of Trump’s State of the Union address this week, it will display the names of donors.

“Your name deserves to be displayed during tonight’s speech,” the Trump campaign website reads. “Please make a special State of the Union contribution to have your name broadcast on the Official Donald J. Trump for President livestream.”

It seems somewhat tone-deaf for the Trump campaign to splash its financial backers’ names over a major presidential address. But it will only appear on one particular live stream for a speech aired on a plethora of mediums.

Specifically, the promise is to show donors’ names during the Trump campaign‘s live stream of the State of the Union. The speech will also be shown on every major TV network, many more online live streams (including at Vox), and the White House’s own official feed. None of those other broadcasts will show the donors’ names.

What’s more, this isn’t pitched toward Trump’s mega-donors — the fundraising solicitation gives people options to contribute a few different amounts between $35 and $2,700, or to write their own amount in.

The president’s fundraising ploy really seems aimed at giving loyal, small-donor Trump superfans a brief “thank you” while squeezing slightly more money out of them, in a way that’s relatively common to political campaigns.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters