Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Benchmark is selling $900 million of its holdings in Uber

Google Ventures, or GV, also sold several hundred million dollars of stock in the transaction.

Benchmark partner Bill Gurley
Benchmark partner Bill Gurley
Benchmark partner Bill Gurley
Michael Kovac/Getty Images for Vanity Fair

Benchmark Capital will end up selling about $900 million of its Uber stock to SoftBank and other buyers, or about 14.5 percent of the venture capital firm’s holdings in the company, according to people familiar with the transaction.

Benchmark, which said last year that Uber could soon be worth more than $100 billion, tried to sell about 25 percent of its shares in the company last month at a price that was less than half that.

But because so many shareholders wanted to sell their position in Uber, Benchmark, like all other shareholders, was able to sell only 58 percent of what it sought to tender — or about 14.5 percent of its holdings, according to the people.

Uber stock was being sold at a significant discount that valued the company at $48 billion. At that pricing, Benchmark would receive about $900 million in cash in return for their 14.5 percent sale. Benchmark owned about 13 percent of the company.

Google Ventures, the venture capital arm of Alphabet, also took home some cash, sources said, as relations between Uber and Alphabet continue to fray. GV sold a similar percentage of their holdings as Benchmark did: GV, which owned 5 percent of the company, successfully sold about 14.5 percent of their stock.

That means GV cashed out about $350 million from the company.

Alphabet’s self-driving arm, Waymo, has recently sued Uber for allegedly stealing trade secrets, and Alphabet’s other investing arm, CapitalG, just this fall led a fundraising round into Lyft, leading many to believe that Alphabet would seek to divest somewhat from Uber, Lyft’s main US competitor.

GV isn’t the only investor that Uber has, at times, angered. Benchmark led Uber’s Series A financing round in 2011 and the company has made the firm a tremendous amount of money — even though relations have soured between Benchmark and the company’s first CEO, Travis Kalanick. Benchmark’s decision to sell some of their earnings will weaken its power in company decision-making, but also locks in some of their winnings ahead of an uncertain IPO in 2019.

But it also could look foolish if Uber’s growth keeps exploding and Benchmark left money on the table. The venture capital firm said in August that its analysis “shows Uber could comfortably be worth over $100B in just two years.”

Other large sellers to the SoftBank-led group, according to the people, include Kalanick’s co-founder Garrett Camp, First Round Capital and Menlo Ventures, though each saw significant reductions in the amount they could sell due to the oversubscription of the tender offer.

Menlo Ventures, which led Uber’s Series B round. will sell about 46% of their shares. First Round, which led Uber’s seed round, will part with about 38% of theirs. Those sales will generate hundreds of millions of dollars for the venture firms that bet on Uber when it was a young, risky company.

And Camp, one of Canada’s wealthiest people, will sell about 15% of his shares. That will net him around $400 million, though several Uber insiders originally expected Camp to tender even more.

Non-sellers include Lowercase Capital and Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers.

Kalanick himself also tucked away some of his earnings. The Uber founder sold about $1.4 billion in the tender offer, despite previously signaling that he wouldn’t sell any of his stock. Benchmark pushed for governance reforms that handicap Kalanick and keep him from returning to the CEO chair in the future — provisions that made it easier for Benchmark to reduce its influence in the boardroom.

Representatives for Benchmark, GV, Camp, Menlo and First Round declined to comment.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh