Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The US won’t give visas to same-sex partners of UN officials anymore

The change applies to foreign diplomats and other employees at international organizations in the US.

Demonstrators carry rainbow flags past the White House during the Equality March for Unity and Peace on June 11, 2017, in Washington, DC. 
Demonstrators carry rainbow flags past the White House during the Equality March for Unity and Peace on June 11, 2017, in Washington, DC. 
Rainbow flags outside the White House, June 2017.
Zach Gibson/Getty Images
Jen Kirby
Jen Kirby is a senior foreign and national security reporter at Vox, where she covers global instability.

The Trump administration has started denying diplomatic visas to same-sex partners of foreign diplomats and officials who work at international organizations in the United States, such as the United Nations.

Those partners who are currently in the US will be forced to marry by the end of the year, change their visa status, or leave the country.

The Trump administration’s decision, which went into effect on Monday, reverses a policy that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put into place in 2009, which made visas available to same-sex partners of foreign diplomats or UN officials. This did not apply to heterosexual unmarried couples.

During a briefing on Tuesday, a State Department official framed the new rules as bringing the visa policy in line with the 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage, and “to promote the equal treatment of all family members and couples.”

But some lawmakers and former diplomats have already criticized the policy change, which was first circulated in a letter in July. Samantha Power, a former ambassador to the United Nations, called the policy “needlessly cruel and bigoted” in a tweet last week.

What does this policy change mean?

A State Department official said at the briefing Tuesday that this policy change will affect about 105 families, with about 55 of those working for international organizations like the UN.

But those employees at the UN and other international organizations will likely feel the brunt of this policy change. The State Department has said it will work with and possibly make exceptions for foreign diplomats who are from countries where same-sex marriage isn’t legal, but whose countries recognize the same-sex spouses of US diplomats.

But this doesn’t apply to UN employees or other US-based international organization officials. They’ll have to be legally married, with no exceptions.

Alfonso Nam, the president of UN Globe, an LGBT advocacy group for UN employees, said that this change could put same-sex couples at risk.

Even if couples can get legally married in a country that recognizes same-sex unions, they have to be confident that the country won’t share that information, or make it widely known, as it could open up those individuals to face criminal charges or discrimination in their home countries.

Though the State Department says it wants to promote equal treatment, heterosexual couples don’t face the same restrictions on where they can get married. They “have comfort of knowing no matter what, that this marriage will be recognized around the world,” Nam said. “Same-sex couples have limited options.”

Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
Podcasts
Did Trump actually help Venezuela?Did Trump actually help Venezuela?
Podcast
Podcasts

Post-Maduro, some Venezuelans are feeling cautiously optimistic.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
5 ways the Iran standoff could end5 ways the Iran standoff could end
Politics

Is the US on the verge of a deal with Iran or a return to war?

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Ukraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might thinkUkraine’s fight against Russia is going better than you might think
Politics

The war in Iran looked like a gift for Russia. It hasn’t worked out that way.

By Joshua Keating
The Logoff
Why Trump says the US-Iran war is overWhy Trump says the US-Iran war is over
The Logoff

Trump’s plan to evade an Iran deadline, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters