Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Some asylum officers say they never got the memo about Trump’s asylum ban

The ban, which covers asylum-seekers who cross the US-Mexico border between official crossings, will be in effect at least until Tuesday.

Paul Ratje/AFP/Getty Images

The Trump administration is set to refuse asylum to adults and families who cross into the US from Mexico, when a proclamation signed by President Donald Trump Friday morning takes effect at midnight.

But mere hours before it becomes official, at least some asylum officers — the first people who will be responsible for implementing the new policy on the ground — tell Vox they still haven’t been emailed guidance from US Citizenship and Immigration Services about it.

Asylum officers conduct the screening interviews that determine whether someone who’s entered the US without papers will be allowed to stay and apply for protection, or be summarily deported. The new policy raises the standard for those screening interviews in the case of people who have crossed at points other than official border crossings. Instead of showing they have a “credible fear” of persecution in the country they’re fleeing (a standard which 75 percent of asylum-seekers pass), these migrants must show they have a “reasonable fear,” a stricter test which has a 25 percent pass rate among the limited population already subject to it.

While the ACLU and other groups have filed suit over the policy, they are not asking the judge in the Northern District of California to stop it from going into effect. According to a motion filed Friday night, the plaintiffs want to have a hearing on Tuesday — with the assumption that the judge could order the Trump administration to stop enforcing the policy during that hearing, or at any time after.

A memo was published — but some asylum officers say they didn’t receive it

The Department of Homeland Security wrote in a fact sheet Friday morning that “On November 9, USCIS issued a new field guidance for asylum officers to adjudicate claims in accordance with the Interim Final Rule and Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(f) and § 215(a)(1) Presidential Proclamation.” A 6-page memo from agency director L. Francis Cissna, outlining the changes made by the regulation and order and reiterating the difference between the “credible fear” and “reasonable fear” standards was posted on the USCIS website Friday night.

Some USCIS staff said they had gotten the Cissna memo via email — but not until 6:30 pm on Friday. Others — including two asylum officers, one of whom works in an office that will be processing cases under the new regulation on Saturday — said they had not received an email at all. (All requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to reporters.)

The failure to send a memo around via email may seem minor. But the interview with an asylum officer is the only chance asylum-seekers may have to demonstrate that they fear persecution in their home country.

The new policy shifts the standard for most of the cases that certain asylum officers (such as those detailed to detention centers where people who have just been apprehended by Border Patrol are kept) will have to deal with. And since asylum officers conducted 10 times as many “credible fear” interviews as “reasonable fear” ones before the new policy, they may not be as familiar with the standard they are now applying to the bulk of their cases.

The Trump administration’s biggest immigration-policy failures have been due to poor training and implementation, from the first travel ban to the family-separation policy of late spring 2018. The next few days will demonstrate if the asylum ban belongs in that category.

More in Politics

Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser