Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

HuffPost Editor in Chief Lydia Polgreen said she wouldn’t have chosen to cover President Trump as entertainment

“I would take a different approach, personally, as a journalist,” Polgreen said at Recode’s Code Media conference.

Asa Mathat

In 2015, Huffington Post Editor in Chief Arianna Huffington decided the publication would cover President Donald Trump’s campaign as entertainment — the company later went back on that.

The new editor in chief, Lydia Polgreen, said she wouldn’t have done that in the first place. In fact, she wants to reach audiences that include Trump voters.

“I would take a different approach, personally, as a journalist,” Polgreen, who spoke at the Code Media conference in Huntington Beach, Calif., said. “For me, it’s less about who you voted for and more about where you stand in the overall political and economic power arrangements.”

“I think that we live in a world where inequality is deepening and there is a top layer of society that includes pretty much all of us in this room who have kind of detached in an escape pod and are floating away with the American dream,” she continued. “I really think about that bottom 80 percent as including a lot of people who voted for Trump, a lot of people who voted for Bernie Sanders and a lot of people who voted for Hillary. But primarily they’re people who feel left out of the prevailing political and economic power arrangement.”

Polgreen used TheSkimm as an example of a publication that was doing a good job of reaching a wider audience that she feels is underserved by news organizations.

“We need to be focused on issues that affect people’s lives and write about them in really relevant ways to people’s experiences” she said. “It’s not just about covering Trump and covering the Trump administration. It’s not just about who’s going to win in 2018 — although those stories are really important.

“It’s less about ‘this is the style of story we’re going to do’ and more about about ‘this is the kind of relationship we’re going to have with our audience,’” she continued. “And it’s fundamentally one of service.”

Watch Polgreen’s full interview below:


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh