Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

These two charts tell you everything you need to know about Google’s and Facebook’s domination of the ad business

Scary! (If you don’t work at Google or Facebook.)

A movie still from “King Kong” showing the ape holding a woman and rampaging across a city skyline
A movie still from “King Kong” showing the ape holding a woman and rampaging across a city skyline
Sunset Boulevard/Corbis via Getty Images
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Sometimes it takes a lot of work to describe the state of the media business.

Sometimes you can do it with a couple charts.

Here’s the latter version, courtesy of MoffettNathanson analyst Michael Nathanson, who spoke today at the Code Media conference.

These two charts neatly summarize what’s happened to the ad business: Google and Facebook are chewing all of it up — at the expense of the companies that used to have the business to themselves.

This first chart shows the growth of Facebook’s and Google’s ad business over the last four years (Twitter is there, too, but it’s not relevant for this discussion), compared with the big TV programmers.

The print guys aren’t in this chart, because Nathanson’s presentation is about the future of the TV guys, but even if they were, they would just be a series of negative bars.

MoffettNathanson

And this chart shows the rapid ascent of the digital guys when it comes to share of the ad market.

You can see that the Facebook/Google duopoly ate the print guys’ lunch many years ago, and finally surpassed the TV guys last year. The good news for the TV guys is that their business has yet to collapse. Which is a pretty grim way to describe “good news.”

MoffettNathanson

The rest of Nathanson’s report wonders just how bad the news for the TV guys will be: Are they looking at a total wipeout, or is there a way for them to retain some value, and even possible growth, in years to come?

You’ll be able to see more of this one in the near future. Stay tuned ...

Watch Nathanson’s entire presentation from Code Media below.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh