Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

SoftBank’s tech funds have invested 40 percent of their $100 billion target

They said it couldn’t be done.

SoftBank Group CEO Masayoshi Son onstage in front of a backdrop in Japanese and English that reads “SoftBank Vision Fund.”
SoftBank Group CEO Masayoshi Son onstage in front of a backdrop in Japanese and English that reads “SoftBank Vision Fund.”
Alessandro Di Ciommo/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Longtime Silicon Valley hands are still aghast that an investing firm can find a way to pour $100 billion into technology companies like SoftBank’s Vision Fund hopes to do.

But the Japanese conglomerate disclosed late Tuesday that its giant investing fund had already invested just under 40 percent of its pool of cash. That should quiet some critics who say it is impossible to spend that much money that quickly.

The Vision Fund and its companion, the $6 billion Delta Fund, invested $27.5 billion through the end of last year, according to a new quarterly earnings report from SoftBank. When you throw in the $7.7 billion invested in Uber and $4.6 billion in Didi earlier this year, the funds have spent $40 billion of their eventual $106 billion pool.

SoftBank chief Masayoshi Son held up the Uber deal’s size as an example of how his firm had changed the game in Silicon Valley.

“$8 billion for one investee — which is probably impossible for a traditional venture capital [firm] to make,” he said, noting that many rival funds have $1 billion or smaller to invest. “We invest in unicorn companies that [are] the leader of a certain segment.”

Not all of that $40 billion is from new investments. Several deals struck by SoftBank are being “offered” to the Vision Fund, most notably a 25 percent stake in Arm Holdings, the British chip company. That’s $8 billion of the fund right there.

Here’s Recode’s ongoing tally of where SoftBank has invested its Vision Fund so far.

The Vision Fund has upended tech investing in Silicon Valley by chasing after some of the sector’s flashiest companies — a phenomenon that has at times both frustrated and amazed rival investors. The fund, which is backed heavily by sovereign wealth funds in Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi, has bought ownership stakes in companies like Slack, Fanatics and WeWork. It also has invested in some public companies like Nvidia.

A total of 26 companies are as of now part of the Vision Fund, according to Son, all of whom he says are “the No. 1 players.”

There’s no signs that he is slowing down. SoftBank on Tuesday announced that it would try to separate the company’s investing and telecommunications arms, which could allow Son more time for dealmaking.

The Vision Fund, which has raised about $92 billion of its $100 billion target, expects to close in the second quarter of this year, the earnings reveal. The fund launched last year and is planning to invest its enormous sum in its first five years.

It’s making quick work.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh