Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Lyft considered buying the startup at the center of Alphabet’s suit against Uber

Otto co-founder Lior Ron said selling to Uber was not guaranteed.

The timeline of events leading up to Uber’s acquisition of self-driving trucking startup Otto has always been a bit muddled.

But Alphabet’s lawsuit against Uber, which centers on that acquisition, has yielded more information about that deal.

Today, on the third day of trial in the U.S. district court for the Northern District of California, Otto co-founder Lior Ron took the stand and testified that selling to Uber was not a guarantee. In fact, he said the startup he created with former Uber and Waymo self-driving engineer Anthony Levandowski was fielding offers from Uber competitor Lyft.

Lyft declined to comment for the story.

Alphabet is suing Uber because the company claims that Levandowski stole files to bring to Uber when he left to start Otto — which Uber later acquired.

As Uber’s former CEO Travis Kalanick testified, he wanted to hire Levandowski and his team to help accelerate Uber’s slow-to-develop self-driving arm. But Levandowski wanted to start his own company. So eventually acquiring Otto would be a solution that achieved both aims.

But leaving Alphabet’s self-driving arm wasn’t always the plan, at least according to Ron’s testimony. According to Ron, both he and Levandowski wanted to help accelerate Alphabet’s self-driving project, later called Waymo. The two decided that the best way was to explore creating autonomous solutions for commercial transportation, in this case driverless trucks.

Have more information or any tips? Johana Bhuiyan is the senior transportation editor at Recode and can be reached at johana@recode.net or on Signal, Confide, WeChat or Telegram at 516-233-8877. You can also find her on Twitter at @JmBooyah.

Email evidence shows that the two drafted a letter to Alphabet CEO Larry Page, signed only by Levandowski, saying that Waymo was broken and the team wasn’t moving fast enough. They advocated for the creation of a second team that would work in parallel on driverless trucks.

Draft of an email Anthony Levandowski eventually sent to Larry Page.
Draft of an email Anthony Levandowski eventually sent to Larry Page.

But Alphabet wasn’t interested in driverless trucks, Ron said during his testimony. That’s when Ron said he and Levandowski started talking to other players, namely Uber and Lyft. While Levandowski was negotiating with Kalanick, writing in a text that Uber’s then-CEO needed to agree to hard terms or he would “destroy him,” the duo was also talking to Lyft about acquiring Otto.

“We had a lot of options on the table,” Ron said during his testimony on Wednesday. “We just weren’t sure what the right option was. My concern was we were very complementary to Google. If we were to partner with Uber ... would it be seen as competitive.”

That meant having discussions with Lyft about different milestones the company would want Otto to meet, as well as prices, even though those conversations did not result in a full term-sheet agreement.

Ultimately, Lyft wasn’t interested in developing self-driving trucks — something Ron said was very important to him.

In the months since Uber acquired Otto, Lyft has ramped up its own self-driving efforts, partnering up with players like Waymo and Ford and opening up its own driverless research and development center.

While neither Lyft nor Alphabet appeared to be interested in the commercial freight space, Ron claimed that he and Levandowski negotiated hard with Uber. In fact, because Otto never reached the technical milestones it agreed to with Uber, he has only amassed $20,000 from that initial transaction to date.

Ultimately, it sold to Uber, sparking what would eventually become the current legal saga that Uber and Alphabet are embroiled in.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh