Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Stormy Daniels still won’t say if she’s got photos of Trump

Anderson Cooper couldn’t get Daniels to say whether she has images to back up her claims of an affair.

Stormy Daniels, who appeared on 60 Minutes to discuss her alleged affair with Donald Trump, pictured on March 9
Stormy Daniels, who appeared on 60 Minutes to discuss her alleged affair with Donald Trump, pictured on March 9
Stormy Daniels, who appeared on 60 Minutes to discuss her alleged affair with Donald Trump, pictured on March 9.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
Anna North
Anna North is a senior correspondent for Vox, where she covers American family life, work, and education. Previously, she was an editor and writer at the New York Times. She is also the author of four novels, including the forthcoming Bog Queen, which you can preorder here.

Does Stormy Daniels have photos to back up her story of an affair with Donald Trump?

That’s one question she didn’t answer during her 60 Minutes interview with Anderson Cooper on Sunday night.

The nondisclosure agreement she signed in October 2016 required her to turn over any “video images, still images, email messages, and text messages” of Trump, leading some to speculate about whether she in fact has such documentary evidence. Daniels’s lawyer, Michael Avenatti, has been hinting that she does, tweeting a photo of a CD on Thursday along with the message, “If ‘a picture is worth a thousand words,’ how many words is this worth?????”

On Sunday, however, she would not answer Cooper when he asked about the existence of photos or other evidence. “My attorney has recommended that I don’t discuss those things.”

Cooper also asked Avenatti about the existence of photos, noting that Avenatti might simply be bluffing.

“You should ask some of the other people in my career when they’ve bet on me bluffing,” Avenatti replied.

But he didn’t offer any more details about any possible evidence.

Earlier on Sunday, Avenatti tweeted that he and Daniels had material they wouldn’t be sharing on 60 Minutes:

There’s been a degree of showmanship in Avenatti’s approach to the Daniels case and it’s possible he’s holding the American people — and the president — in suspense. It’s also possible that there are no photos.

Ultimately, though, that may not matter. Whether or not Daniels can prove she had sex with Trump, there’s no doubt that she was paid $130,000 not to talk about having sex with Trump. And what matters now is whether that was an illegal campaign contribution — and whether Daniels was bullied or threatened into silence by Trump’s associates, as she claimed on Sunday.

As Avenatti told Cooper, “This is about the cover-up.”

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters