Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

We finally know how much money Nest makes

Google’s smart-home gadget brand generated $726 million in revenue last year.

Smart thermostat Nest
Smart thermostat Nest
George Frey / Getty
Rani Molla
Rani Molla was a senior correspondent at Vox and has been focusing her reporting on the future of work. She has covered business and technology for more than a decade — often in charts — including at Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal.

How much money is Nest, Google’s smart-home gadget brand, bringing in?

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, famously doesn’t give much detail about how its individual businesses are performing. Even YouTube’s finances are still opaque.

But a one-time accounting change, detailed in Alphabet’s first-quarter results today, reveals that Nest generated $726 million in revenue last year and an operating loss of $621 million.

How do we know that?

Last quarter, Nest was reabsorbed into Google, where it has joined the company’s broader hardware team. Previously it was a subsidiary company under Alphabet, which aggregates financial results for all of its non-Google businesses in a segment called “Other bets.” As part of the change, for investor context, Alphabet today published a version of all of last year’s financials as if Nest were part of Google and not an “Other bet.”

After comparing the two sets of results, we learned that Nest generated $278 million in revenue during last year’s holiday fourth quarter, which is almost as much as it did in all of 2015, according to previous Recode reporting. But it still hasn’t passed $1 billion in sales, and it isn’t close to being profitable on an operating basis.

Nest represented most of the revenue for the “Other bets” — 60 percent of it in 2017 — but far less than 1 percent of Alphabet’s total revenue.

Google bought Nest for more than $3 billion in 2014. And when it formed the Alphabet holding company structure in 2015, Nest was to be one of the main beneficiaries, running as a semi-independent subsidiary under its founder, former Apple executive Tony Fadell.

But Fadell left in 2016, and Nest was never as successful as it could have been on its own. Now let’s see how it does as part of Google — though it’s unlikely we’ll find out more numbers anytime soon.

Overall, Alphabet made $9 billion in profit on $31 billion in revenue last quarter.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh