Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook’s upcoming developer conference is a chance to explain what comes after Cambridge Analytica

For the first time, Facebook appears to be closing itself up. So what happens next?

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg
David Ramos / Getty

Facebook has impeccable timing.

That’s because the company — which is still trying to claw its way out of a massive hole after the world learned just how fast and loose it was with everybody’s personal data — has its annual developer conference, F8, next week in San Jose, Calif.

And while the social network’s conference highlights in recent years have been eye-popping — AR glasses! Helicopter drones! Mind-reading technology! — the bulk of the conference has historically been tailored toward back-end software and developers, many of whom have built major parts of their business or app on Facebook’s services, or with the help of Facebook data.

What makes this year different from any in Facebook’s history is that amid a massive privacy scandal, the company just spent the past six weeks clamping down on much of the data that these developers have come to rely on.

After it was learned that Facebook’s Login API allowed an outside research firm to buy the data of as many as 87 million users without their consent, Facebook scrambled to restrict the amount of data that outsiders can access. That included closing off one of Instagram’s older APIs entirely, months before the company had planned to, and without warning to developers who still used it. It also cut off third-party data partners it previously used for ad targeting.

Most of the changes came without any heads-up to developers. The F8 conference, then, is a chance for Facebook to explain what the heck happens next — to its developer partners and beyond.

When Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg spoke with Recode last month about the data scandal, he admitted that his original vision — a world where all apps and services included some kind of social layer (Facebook) — was actually misguided.

“Frankly, I just got that wrong,” he said. “I was maybe too idealistic on the side of data portability, that it would create more good experiences. And it created some, but I think what the clear feedback was from our community was that people value privacy a lot more. And they would rather have their data locked down and be sure that nothing bad will ever happen to it than be able to easily take it and have social experiences in other places.”

That mindset, though — to make everything more open and connected — has been relatively pervasive at Facebook since the beginning. It was even the company’s mission statement until early last year.

But now Facebook feels like it’s starting to close itself off for the first time. It’s the beginning of a correction.

Which is why, coincidentally, F8 is happening at the perfect time. Facebook is never short on press coverage or attention, but the conference gives the company a chance to explain exactly where Facebook stands long-term with the people who have come to rely on its services.

  • Does Facebook want to be an open platform? What does “open” mean from now on?
  • Are there more API changes coming?
  • Why should developers invest time and effort into using Facebook APIs if they can change without warning?

That last question in particular is key, because we’ve seen this play out before, just not necessarily with developers. Facebook has a history of changing the rules quickly and without warning — just ask any digital publisher who has ever relied on Facebook and its News Feed algorithm for referral traffic. Anyone reliant on Facebook’s services to succeed is at Facebook’s mercy. It’s a bad place to be.

The changes Facebook is making are ultimately good for Facebook users. There’s no need for the social network to share all of your information with another app or website, and it’s a positive thing that Facebook is promising to take user control and privacy more seriously. (Assuming it, ya know, actually takes user control and privacy more seriously.)

But Facebook is also not going to abandon developer relationships altogether — far from it. These developers provide a lot of data for Facebook, too. It’s clear that the company is taking a closer look at who has access to what, and next week is the perfect chance to set the record straight on where things go from here.

As BuzzFeed’s John Paczkowski wrote on Monday, “Instead of touting the next big thing, Facebook and Google might do well to focus on the current thing and solve the problems that they have so far failed miserably and repeatedly to address.”

We’ll find out next week how serious Facebook is about fixing what’s broke.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh