Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump: I don’t know anything about the $130,000 my lawyer paid Stormy Daniels

It’s his first public statement about the “hush money” his personal lawyer paid to a porn actress.

President Trump Departs White House For West Virginia
President Trump Departs White House For West Virginia
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Jen Kirby
Jen Kirby is a senior foreign and national security reporter at Vox, where she covers global instability.

President Donald Trump said Thursday that he did not know about the $130,000 in “hush money” that his personal lawyer Michael Cohen paid to porn actress Stormy Daniels.

Trump’s denial was the first time he’s made a public statement about the money given to Daniels ahead of the 2016 election to keep her silent about her alleged 2006 affair with Trump. The president was responding to questions from reporters after returning from an event in West Virginia.

Trump replied “no” when asked if he had had knowledge about the payment to Daniels. A reporter then asked if he knew why Cohen made the payment.

“You’ll have to ask Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen is my attorney,” Trump said, according to the pool report. “You’ll have to ask Michael.”

Trump also denied knowing where the money to pay Daniels came from and ignored another question on whether he had ever set up a fund that Cohen could use to make such a payment.

The White House has denied Trump had an affair with Daniels. Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, filed a lawsuit in March claiming that the nondisclosure agreement she entered into regarding the alleged affair was invalid because Trump never signed it.

Michael Avenatti, Daniels’s attorney, tweeted an apparent reference to President Bill Clinton’s impeachment on charges including perjury, in response to Trump’s remarks: “As history teaches us, it is one thing to deceive the press and quite another to do so under oath.”

Avenatti followed up to say that Daniels’s lawsuit just got stronger: “You can’t have an agreement when one party claims to know nothing about it,” he said.

Trump had been oddly quiet about the whole saga until Thursday. Previously, the closest he had come to directly addressing the scandal was a somewhat cryptic tweet about “Fake News” that he sent out the Monday after Daniels’s primetime 60 Minutes interview on March 25, in which she detailed the alleged affair with Trump and said she had been threatened to keep silent by those close to him.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters