Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook has suspended hundreds of apps in its effort to uncover another Cambridge Analytica

Thousands of apps have been reviewed, and 200 have been suspended pending further review.

Facebook is on the hunt for other Cambridge Analytica-type bad actors: Developers who had access to Facebook user data and employed it in a way that violates the company’s guidelines.

On Monday, Facebook offered an update to that hunt: The company says it has reviewed “thousands of apps” with access to Facebook user data and suspended 200 of them “pending a thorough investigation into whether they did in fact misuse any data.”

That doesn’t mean there are 200 more Cambridge Analytica-type scenarios out there. It just means that there are 200 other apps Facebook wants to take a closer look at. It’s possible they will all be cleared of any wrongdoing. It’s possible many of them will not.

It’s also possible that this number will grow. A company spokesperson told Recode that Facebook is still very early on in the audit process. That means Facebook plans to investigate thousands more apps on top of the thousands the company has already looked at. It’s highly likely that there will be more potential offenders that Facebook decides to suspend.

“Where we find evidence that these or other apps did misuse data, we will ban them and notify people via this website,” Facebook wrote in a blog post Monday, linking to the same site it used to alert people if their data was shared with Cambridge Analytica.

Facebook has been sharing user data with apps for years. It’s one of the core ways Facebook grew, especially in its early days. The problem with this audit is that no matter what Facebook finds, it’s going to be too late. Facebook can ban bad actors, but once the data leaves Facebook’s servers, there isn’t much the company can do to get it back.

Same thing goes for user trust. If Facebook finds a bunch of other Cambridge-Analytica type scenarios played out over the past few years, it’ll be tough to convince anybody that Facebook can take care of user privacy moving forward.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh