Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Telegram is scuttling its public ICO. Here’s why.

Only the wealthy will be able to participate in an ICO meant to democratize who can make money off tech.

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov
Telegram CEO Pavel Durov
Telegram CEO Pavel Durov
Nadine Rupp / Getty

Ever since Telegram raised $1.7 billion from private investors, people close to the deal have expected the company to no longer need to reach regular, mom-and-pop investors in order to fund a massive cryptocurrency project.

The messaging company Telegram has now officially decided to scrap the public part of the Telegram ICO, according to the Wall Street Journal. It’s not surprising, but it is quite the about-face for a company that was planning to raise hundreds of millions of dollars through a public initial coin offering that was meant to democratize the way blockchain projects are funded.

One reason why this makes sense:

  • Telegram doesn’t need the money, and likely doesn’t want the scrutiny. Telegram’s CEO, Pavel Durov, only initially secured $850 million from a global base of investors early in 2018 — from some established venture capital firms like Benchmark and Sequoia Capital. But then Telegram collected a second tranche of $850 million in what has to be one of the quickest fundraising events in tech. The company doesn’t need much more than $1.7 billion to actually build and market the Telegram Open Network: The whole company only plans to spend $400 million over the next three years, according to the white paper.
  • So why risk more regulatory scrutiny by opening the ICO to the public? It remains unclear how the Securities and Exchange Commisssion will regulate these initial coin offerings, and that uncertainty to this day still freezes some venture capitalists from participating in ICOs. Some Telegram investors have acknowledged in recent months that a public sale could encourage more oversight given that now it wouldn’t just be wealthy venture capitalists who possibly could be hurt by a token sale gone wrong.

But here’s one big reason why this doesn’t make sense:

  • Telegram, like other social messaging companies, claims to be on a mission to connect the world. And initial coin offerings as a concept claim to offer more and more everyday people the chance to financially support and profit off a good idea. That’s not happening here: Only people who qualify as “accredited investors” — the wealthy, the well-connected institutions — are eligible to buy into the Telegram ICO at a discount.

This could be a foreboding sign for ICOs — and could limit the amount that they upend the venture capital system. If public sales become too risky, then it will still be the elite who are able to cash in on the success of startups, blockchain-related or otherwise.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh