Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

DOJ is giving a special partisan briefing on the Trump-Russia investigation to GOP Congress members

There’s also a bipartisan meeting.

White House Communications Director Hope Hicks Is Interviewed By House Intelligence Committee During Russian Investigation
White House Communications Director Hope Hicks Is Interviewed By House Intelligence Committee During Russian Investigation
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Thursday afternoon, the Department of Justice plans to brief a bipartisan group of members of Congress about the use of confidential FBI sources in the Russia investigation during the course of the 2016 campaign. The meeting is fairly normal course, since the “Gang of Eight” Congress members conduct sensitive intelligence oversight.

But before DOJ officials conduct that briefing, they are going to do a separate Republicans-only briefing for House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes (R-CA), who is also a member of the Gang of Eight, and for House Government Reform Committee Chair Trey Gowdy (R-SC), who is not. Paul Ryan, who, as House speaker, is a member of the Gang of Eight, is going to skip the Gang of Eight briefing in order to make it to a GOP fundraiser in Houston, so he’ll attend the Gowdy-Nunes briefing instead.

All of which naturally raises the question of why:

  • Why, if this topic is so important, is it not important enough for Ryan to reschedule his fundraiser?
  • And why does Gowdy get a briefing that the Democratic ranking member on his committee isn’t invited to?
  • And for that matter, why do Nunes and Gowdy need a briefing that no Democrats (or even Senate Republicans) are allowed to witness?

The suspicion, naturally, is that this isn’t about oversight at all. Giving information to members of Donald Trump’s own party opens the door to the kind of back-channeling to the president and his legal team that the special counsel process was supposed to prevent in the first place.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fundTrump’s brazen plan for a $1.7 billion slush fund
The Logoff

Trump will reportedly drop his IRS lawsuit — for a price.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The rise of the progressive billionaire candidateThe rise of the progressive billionaire candidate
Politics

Why some on the left are feeling warmly toward Tom Steyer and other very wealthy contenders.

By Andrew Prokop
Politics
Mifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for nowMifepristone survives another Supreme Court scare — for now
Politics

Only Thomas and Alito publicly dissented.

By Ian Millhiser
Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop