Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook still doesn’t know what user data Cambridge Analytica actually had

Did the Trump campaign have suspicious-looking data sets? “No, not really.”

There are still some (big) rocks to be turned over in Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica drama.

Despite suspending the data firm, which collected the personal data of as many as 87 million Facebook users without their permission, Facebook is still trying to figure how big the Cambridge Analytica problem is.

“To this day, we still don’t actually know what data Cambridge Analytica had,” COO Sheryl Sandberg said on Tuesday at Recode’s annual Code Conference in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.

That’s not really a secret, though it’s an interesting reminder. Facebook was set to conduct an audit of Cambridge Analytica, a data firm used by Donald Trump’s presidential campaign during the 2016 election. But that audit was put on hold when the U.K. government came in to conduct their own investigation.

Facebook has clearly not picked the audit back up — at least not yet.

When asked if Facebook employees, who helped with the Trump campaign, noticed any kind of suspicious data set, Sandberg said, “No, not really.”

Understanding what data Cambridge Analytica had is important because it could be useful in trying to determine how much of a role Facebook may have had in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Here are some other highlights from the conversation:

  • Sandberg gently pushed back on recent criticism from Apple CEO Tim Cook about their data troubles, saying Facebook “respectfully disagrees” with his critique. Recall that Zuckerberg said Cook’s comments were “extremely glib.”
  • Sandberg said that she expects Facebook to draw more questions from regulators if it makes more multi-billion dollar acquisitions like Oculus or WhatsApp. “Certainly as you get bigger there’s more scrutiny of acquisitions — and there should be,” she said. Sandberg predicted that a major acquisition would “probably be allowed” as long as the acquired company wasn’t related to Facebook’s core business, but rather an expansion of it.
  • Facebook is doing more in hardware — check out the new Oculus headset — but don’t expect Facebook to reboot its past failed effort to create an operating system or its own mobile device: “I don’t think we’re talking about going back into phones,” Sandberg said.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh