Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Match Group says Facebook’s new dating feature will have ‘no negative impact on Tinder’

“[People don’t] want to mix Facebook with their dating lives,” says Match CEO Mandy Ginsberg.

Three women stand on a street in London, interacting with their phones
Three women stand on a street in London, interacting with their phones
Christian Vierig / Getty Images

Match Group, which owns numerous dating services, including Tinder, Match.com and OkCupid, said again on Tuesday that it’s not worried about Facebook getting into the dating game. This time, it has some numbers to back it up.

When Facebook surprised everyone by launching a dating feature last week at its annual developer conference, Match Group stock took a huge hit. At the time, company executives went on the attack.

“Come on in. The water’s warm,” said Joey Levin, CEO of IAC, which owns a controlling stake in Match. “Their product could be great for U.S./Russia relationships.”

“We’re flattered that Facebook is coming into our space — and sees the global opportunity that we do — as Tinder continues to skyrocket,” added Match CEO Mandy Ginsberg. “We’re surprised at the timing given the amount of personal and sensitive data that comes with this territory.”

Now Match is back to let investors know they shouldn’t worry about Facebook’s new product, but it’s using numbers to back up its claim. When Match Group reported Q1 earnings on Tuesday, the most interesting part was its argument to investors that Facebook shouldn’t be considered a threat.

The company’s earnings slides included a page basically dedicated to Facebook. The slide claims that the “average user” for dating services uses three products at once — meaning it’s not a winner-take-all market — and included a chart showing that the vast majority of new Tinder users no longer sign up with their Facebook profile.

“They didn’t want to mix Facebook with their dating lives,” said Ginsberg, in a statement. “We also saw a surge in new users, who obviously wanted to keep their dating life separate from their family and friends. This is not a utility feature. In the world of dating, brand and the intent of the community matter.”

“We don’t think FB will have any impact on Tinder, which is our growth engine,” she continued.

That’s easy to say, of course, but Facebook tends to throw its weight around when it sets its mind to something. It’s still unclear if dating will fall under that category, but Match Group is evidently thinking a lot about it, even if it won’t admit it’s concerned.

Match’s earning numbers looked good. The company reported better-than-expected revenue of $407 million, up 36 percent over last year, and better than the $385 million analysts were expecting.

Tinder, the mobile dating feature that will undoubtedly draw comparisons to whatever Facebook comes out with, now has 3.5 million paying subscribers, up 368,000 over Q4. The stock has not really moved in after-hours trading.

Match Group

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh